Yeah Evola had point, but Evola is traditionalist

Sadly English only

i don't entirely agree with the characterization of "imprisonment in Nature"

for them, transcendence is real as a starting point

Is traditionalism bad?

i think "Nature" *is* transcendental

No, I consider myself a Traditionalist

ultimately it is a direct connection with the basic layer of existence

Recent writings on religion: http://www.amerika.org/science/evidence-versus-logical-fact/

the thing the Upanishads hint at

Nature is the logical system, like your operating system

But then the operating system has unexpected behaviors

Programs can run on it

Their actions are not always anticipated

I won't argue against Evola's point, I come to it in a way when i say I don't consider possible a Neo-Paganism as a faith

http://www.juliusevola.com/julius_evola/texts/The_Doctrine_of_Awakening.rtf

I have that book

http://www.juliusevola.com/julius_evola/texts/decadence.txt

great read, slow, but very insightful

Great book

Probably my favorite

doctrine ?

Yes, I think it's his clearest

About general concepts

i stopped at half-way of practice part, since i culdnt proceed with practice

but principles parts is pure gold

It's kind of impossible to really practice ascesis if you don't live alone

oh wow. goosebumps reading that

decadence

"They know not warriors, only soldiers."

Yeah, modern war as a large scale hostage situation

save civillians and stuff

this is really gold

"It no longer knows Wisdom. It ignores the majestic silence of those who have mastered themselves: the enlightened calm of seers, the exalted reality of those in whom the idea becomes blood, life, and power. Instead it is drowning in the rhetoric of "philosophy" and "culture", the speciality of professors, journalists, and sportsmen who issue plans, programs, and proclamations."

thanks @diversity_is_racism

DIR, were those articles on Amerika yours ?

Oh i cheked now

I'm of a feeling that anybody today, who is beyond all these agitations of faiths, of Muslims, Evangelicals, all these masses, social pathos, problems, global suffering

Who isn't informed by sociology of masses altogheter

Cannot adhere to a faith, culturally and aesthetically purified

Such as let' say, reconstructed Nordic neopaganism