Message from @Beemann
Discord ID: 470004214907535360
but you also cannot just make up your own stuff, at least not without explaining it.
because then people will not understand you
and you will be isolated
Languages do evolve, thus we need language reforms now and then
But we also need the "standard" language to conduct business without misunderstanding
reporting back.... yeah its not that lefty, lol was jsut conservatives that ken burns is a left himself XD
the vietnam war
Language needs to evolve for utility. When you reduce utility (figuratively using literally) you are not growing the language
You are actually making it harder to communicate certain ideas
languages simultaneously increase and decrease in simplicity in different areas
Sure, but you need to be cognizant of where that's happening and why, or you might find your future a little doubleplus ungood comrade
languages have generally evolved very organically, if something would ruin the language it simply won't catch on
unless you force it
Have is not an assurance of will
although sometimes you do end up with tibetan, and nobody ever wants their language to turn into tibetan
given the amount of time languages have been evolving, i can confidently say we will not fuck up any language unless we start manually fucking with it
Right, and that's the danger I'm rather specifically referring to
so, manually fucking with language??
Do you remember the "old" definition of racism?
oh yeah, the trend of trying to intentionally redefine words is certainly very very bad
sorry, i jumped in in the middle and, given your figuratively/literally example thought you were talking about the excessive use of hyperbole in english, not the malicious redefining of words
No I just mean redefining at either the loss of utility wholesale, or for partisan purposes
I honestly don't think we gain anything by losing the word literally to emphasis, but it was just an example of how utility can be lost
well, for the literally example, it will eventually reach the point where literally and figuratively will be synonyms and we will be using a new word that means something similar enough to the current definition of literally
and then at some point either literally or figuratively will probably fall out of use
language is a big dumb ride that usually doesn't actually go anywhere lol
I think it *can* go somewhere
It just goes there occasionally, and in spite of the userbase
yeah, it takes an absurd amount of time though. most changes are just going in circles
There's also organic changes in a word that are not so good.
Like the continual redefinition of violence to where now words are violence
that's not organic, that's one of those changes that are being forced
Yeah, very few people actually believe that, but the loud socjus minority make it seem bigger than it really is
But that's things functioning as intended
I disagree. Violence has overgone *braodening* as it's called in linguistics.
https://www.thoughtco.com/broadening-semantic-generalization-1689181
Only within a clique
This is convenient for some people, but the mental-health nuts on Tumblr seem to *honestly believe* that words and ideas that cause distress are equivalent to physical violence (and will point to psychology stuff to try and make that point)
It's a growing clique though.
I don't think it is, tbh
The lefty purity spiral is real
They hemorrhage moderates the more hard-line they get