Message from @DrWittMDPhD
Discord ID: 539359949877280778
Fun
I agree with the guns off the Streets thing.
Thing is: Who are the ones that cause the Problems?
Yeah if there are guns on the road, I wanna grab them.
I'd start a collection
I purchased 7.62x54R from Wolf via ClassicFirearms.
Then, I found 7.62x54R online from Tulammo via Eagle Rock America, but according to Wolf's page on Wikipedia "[Wolf's] ammunition was mostly manufactured by Tula Cartridge Plant in Tula, Tula District, Russia from 2005 to 2009."
Does Wolf just resell Tulammo's ammunition, or no?
This is also another really nice toy
All in one optics
thermal, digital night vison ( yea, thats an after thought), and day glass scope
thermal I believe runs at 30mhz?
Fully user programable with end user accessable API
Can record to itself and or stream out via a number of different RF options
"on the streets" just means "private ownership"
The democratic party's official platform on guns on their website says they want to get "assault weapons" and "high capacity" magazines off the streets
(Banning them)
I was replying to stefan who was saying he agreed with the statement of "getting guns off the streets"
Yeah he's German. What do you expect?
Just clarifying for him
tulammo is good stuff, its the only 54R i get
**Forgotten Weapons** Uploaded a new youtube video!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d95MppOTaw4
And the people who hate firearms don't care, they just want the firearms banned
Politicians love vague terms like "getting guns off of the streets" specifically because they're vague without sounding like it. People can interpret them as an endorsement of whatever specific policies they support, the politicians can treat them as a mandate to do whatever it is they actually want to do, and they can define their own success metrics to either make it seem as if they're accomplishing something regardless of whether or not they actually are, or to make it seem like the opposition is being intransigent.
To a moderate supporter of gun control, getting guns off the streets sounds like targeting criminal use of firearms, to a fanatic it sounds like support for an outright ban, both hear what they want to hear, so they vote for the candidate
But because the mandate is poorly defined, it's difficult to call the politician out whether they go too far, or fail to do enough. They can simply choose the interpretation that puts them in the best light, presume that the majority of their supporters voted based on that interpretation, and that their critics are a radical fringe
And likewise, a poorly defined mandate does not lend itself to reliable success metrics, so if the politician in question wants you to believe they're doing good work, they pick whatever metric is most convenient to show some sort of success
If they want you to believe that they could be doing so much more if it weren't for those obstructionists on the other side of the aisle who want dead children and blood on the streets, they use the metrics that show how bad their chosen issue is
lol I ordered more murdoch murdoch shit
I'm not even a white nationalist
Their content just makes me laugh so much
and I can't give them superberries
Murdoch Murdoch is beautiful, Murdoch Murdoch is based
So tonight I wanted to write and my muse went out drinking so this guy came and gave me bad ideas https://proxy.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fweaponsman.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2013%2F09%2Fj_m_browning_Himself.jpg&f=1
Now I am elbow deep in a build
Ooo