Thats true

Bottom line is that rights don't exist without enforcement. The only way things are enforced is through some mechanism of authority.

They still exist retard

You just have to think loose with the definition of authority to get that to fit in AnCapistan

The only way they dont is if people cease to think

Well they exist as much as unicorns exist

As an idea

If that's the route you wanna go down

They're only in the material world through enforcement by some form of authority

Rights are derived from thought

Yes as are all things, but there's a difference in our view on the definition of rights "existing"

They are only manifest as a rule in reality through enforcement

I guess you could squeeze it and say for rights to exist we must own ourselves

Which is kind of authority

But either way they come from thought

Yeah but the concept of unicorns come from thought, and they don't exist in the material world

This is an important distinction

Sure but rights are based on the metaphysics

Yes, but they have a material consequence through their enforcement through authority

Also unicorns are considered to be material if they existed

Unicorns exist in a lesser capacity than a horse, or an enforced human right.

They only exist metaphysically, where a right is rooted in metaphysics, but extends to the real world through enforcement

Everything extends through metaphysics

Yeah which is my point

That's a lesser form of existence than something measurable in objective reality

They exist as a concept

Every idea exists metaphysically, but they exist in a lesser sense than the material

Literally nothing "doesn't exist" if you define existence to be only dependent on being an idea

That's why things existing metaphysically only shouldn't be considered to exist purely based on the idea of them being able to be thought.

True but the way they are written and talked about in mythology is based on it being material

Yes, so that's a better definition of existence.

But for a concept to exist one must be rationall

No not really. The concept of rage or lust can be felt, they don't need to be rationalized.

Those are percepts

Rage is still a concept

Define rage

Violent, uncontrollable anger.

According to google

Thats a percept id say it doesnt combine two or more concretes