I don't care for Shadman's art, but I do have to give him credit for not giving a fuck about who he pisses off with his art.

I'm trying to think of the very concept of a sex-negative furry and it just doesn't compute. Unrestricted intimacy is just such a vital part of the fandom I can't even.

its a weird time

i have met a furry who wasent sex positive for psychological reasons once but i think thats another thing completely

in a time of true chaos, nothing makes sense

furries must be eliminated

i consiter humans to be furries though

im fine with killing all anthropamorphized ww2 bombers though

is that the new silent hill?

I heard the T-pose is wacist now

You know that the taur-supremacy will eliminate us all anyway

Everything is sexist

everything is racist

everything is homophobic

you're sexist

and it's up to fourchan to point it all out. 😄

euthanize yourself

@Neja Testosterone is the chemical they were talking about. Lower the testosterone level relative to estrogen levels to make men more feminine. That is the chemical method. There are a few way to do this, one would be injecting estrogen, another would be castration.

castrations has a very different meaning to a metal eating lifeform

castrations has a very different meaning to a metal eating lifeform

tmw discord totally loses its shit when your trying to share a dumb dad level joke

it happens T_T

@Grenade123 Sorry to be so blunt but your understanding of this matter is very halfwitted.
"Lower the testosterone level relative to estrogen levels to make men more feminine." You don't even know what the estrogen levels of human females are, or you wouldn't phrase it that dumb.
Castration is not a chemical method. It has hormon level changing effects because the bloody T-factory is gone. That is a physical process. You then get the expectable results and therefore should substitute testosterone; when we speak of "chemical castration" we refer of the destruction of the T-factories, the testes. In both cases you don't have functioning testes anymore. That is the castration; not the resulting hormonal levels as you framed it. Hence reversed causality on your part

im trying to find the origin of this castration conversation just to figure out what its actually about

First it came up in recent memory was in a conversation with a dyslexic natsoc promoting eugenics.

'Eugenicist, castrate thyself.'

weird fetishes these ethnonationalists have

There is no fun without nonsense

this just isint really a good punishment for a government system to hand out, lowers your lifespan unless you take hormone suppliments because both testosterone and estrogen are vital chemicals in the natural homeostasus of humans. additionally it doesent stop the problem it only stops repeat offences, has no consiterations for the psychological effects that could lead to creating worse behavure. and it doesent stop first offences just like the death penalty doesent stop first offences

You seem to be rather invested in this topic, Neja, what's your interest?

doesent really work with the idea of creating productive members of society

The crux of the argument the person I was debating the matter with was one of genetic fatalism.

@RyeNorth I'm what the neomarxists would call "TrueScum".
MtF with the real issue and a deep interest in the science of this crap because I wanted for life of me understand this crap and find a different solution

They were saying that criminality is genetic. Their intent wasn't to rehabilitate, it was to eliminate faulty genes.

i kinda think then if they were saying "castration" and "chemical" they were using code of zyclon b

I was politically active for the past ten years, party work; we were very science/facts oriented back then, until the activists and other corrupt and corrupting people flooded the fun and then you get accused of and being dismissed as just another white cis male who wouldn't understand the problems of transgenders (transtrenders without dysphoria), while they just didn't know that you had the real issue, just didn't tell anyone... but I digress. Rough enough background?