Message from @Neja
Discord ID: 446768624838115349
CDU is the christian conservative party. but with a crypto-socialist like merkel... they can't act conservative in any way
Not just Merkel's fault, but she pulled one of the very very big levers
Martin Schulz and JC Juncker are just as much at fault, but their actions were further in the background
I wouldn't say the troubles in EU are Merkels fault entirely, She was a big driving force,
The biggest reason is ALL those spineless "globalist" leaders in western Europe bending over for virtue signalling
and i say globalist in quote marks, because i dont think these people think of wanting new world order, they just want money and to Look virtueous, and are too disconnected to realise what shit they're doing
What people forget is that one of the last quotes of Helmut Kohl, I think when Merkel got her Calergi-award, was "She's destroying my Europe..." ("Die macht mir mein Europa kaputt")
the leaders of other EU countries usually bend to germany, because germany is the big driving force of the EU
Denmark does have it's problems with the immigrants they still got and can't get out yet. Their stop made the big news, you don't hear much about the other stuff. Denmark's a small country, mind you.
i just hope the continuing pressure, flipping rightwing countries, and extra strain from brexit start breaking this farce appart
sadly the only logical way for now. we can't get the pendulum to the center easily right now. the left ideologies are too strong and in way too high places of government and society. this stuff needs to break apart before we can even hope to slowly swing in slowly into the middle. just hope it doesn't get too ugly when it swings to the right
in a way, i have to choose between pest and cholera anyway
the far left abuses my medical issues for its own gain and distorts them for it, and invites really dangerous people into the country en masse that want my life just as much as the far far right wingers
what are far far right wingers? 😛
the logical conclusion, if you are forced to vote with a gun to your head might be actually the right wing, at least "not the left"; in order to stop even more murderous people around
the actual neonazis
aah the Nationalist Socialists
they're as opposed to the whole gay and transsexual idea as the muslims are
some of them are
and with the degenerate if not clownish obnoxious displays the left portrays us as, i can hardly be mad at them tbh <.<
ive actually met some who dont really care that much one way or another about gender issues
tbh, in germany we make quite a point of insisting to call them *neo*nazis; because they really don't have a lot in common with the actual nazis of the past
most of them are thugs
a friend of mine calls himself a social nationalist
well actual nazis were nationalist socialists, Hitlers part WAS the german labor party after all
Neo-nazi's are just angry people that hate X for Y reason
it's a bit more complicated than that...
but...
it's kinda late here, and I still wanted to watch yet another auschwitz documentary. because that's totally what you should do when depressed 😛
not that the nazis didint have thugs in their ranks though
Was super nice talking with you all
cya
but imo, many sides draw links and paralels,
And only use the 1D spectrum to shove any bad attribute on the opposite side
cya Neja
not to mention people draw social stances together with economic stances
@Neja "'Lower the testosterone level relative to estrogen levels to make men more feminine.' You don't even know what the estrogen levels of human females are, or you wouldn't phrase it that dumb."
i wasn't talking about females, i was talking about men. Specifically the levels of each hormone in the body. I'm assuming you know that both males and females have certain amounts of each in their bodies. I also assume that sex change doctors know more than me about what can make a male more feminine but perhaps my understanding of how much estrogen or what it does is a bit flawed. I figured they used it to bring out feminine features and characteristics in the body, then used suppressors or removed the testes to lower the level of testosterone to hinder or diminish more masculine features, such as chest hair or facial hair.
"when we speak of "chemical castration" we refer of the destruction of the T-factories, the testes. In both cases you don't have functioning testes anymore. That is the castration; not the resulting hormonal levels as you framed it. Hence reversed causality on your part"
Sorry, perhaps misspoke. First off, i'm not talking about "chemical castration". Just castration as it refers to testosterone, which is a hormone, which are a chemical substance in our body. Not chemical in the terms of "things not to ingest because they are bad for you" (*cough* tide pod idiots *cough*). So chemical in the bio/chemistry sense, not warning label sense, if that makes ...sense (i need better wording). Now, this relates to my understanding of the original comment "So there's a chemical means of political control?". This is based off a picture posted somewhere above that more masculine men where on the right, and more feminine men where on the left. So, i read "chemical means" as by removing the testes to decrease testosterone and/or increasing the estrogen levels using supplements. Which is chemical so far in as hormones are chemicals (this is still based of if my understanding of bio is correct. i seem to recall them being refereed to as chemical messengers/chemical substances at some point but maybe i'm wrong in that technicality). Also, i may have found my comment that added to the confusion: "damages the production of testosterone, which is chemical" that should read "which is **a** chemical", my bad.
At any rate, i was only trying to help clear up what to me seemed like a misunderstanding of what was meant by the term "chemical means".
wall of text kills Dr.Wol for 1 life
Also, sorry I pissed you off because i didn't mean too. And if it wasn't me that pissed you off but something else going in life, i'm sorry and hope that goes away and stops annoying you
Lowering the level of Testosterone doesn't make men more femine,
It just kills their masculine-?ness?
Making them less prone to alpha-male behaviour
Think of it like a color scheme, If you have 255 Red, 10 Yellowand 0 Blue, your color will jsut be bright red, if you lower the red to say 25, you suddenly get an Orange-ish color
Thats why men with lower testosterone are just less typical alpha behaviour
and Estrogen is to the developing body of a wamen what Testosterone is for a man
Estrogen produces bobs and stuffs, Testosterone chesthair, denser muscles and beard
