id argue there are probably less africans with depression per capita than europeans or americians
But Europeans and Americans can build and maintain good countries.
yes there is some work to do but once we remove the degenerate influences things will get alot better.
you use this word good and i dont think it means what you think it means
We can build and maintain first world countries while blacks can't, it's that simple.
well zimbawe did try but then we fucked them up by the time they reached a feudal state
You put arms and econmic embargoes on Rhodesia and Rhodesia was in the middle of a civil war yet it was still better than Zimbabwe.
Look what the Rhodesians achieved in 90 years.
The Zimbabweans can't even farm beyond the subsistence level.
~~~I would not want to live in any other nation, white or otherwise, than the one I'm presently in.~~~
~~~Everything else, white or otherwise, is going to shit.~~~
Disregard that. I might not be opposed to Japan.
Yes and why do you think Japan is successful?
Really?
You're asking me this, again.
Yes why do you think Japan is successful?
It's not immigration full-stop
It's unchecked mass immigration.
Liberia doesn't have any immigration either.
Sure it does.
It has output.
People of different races can be compatible with and unite around a master culture.
I suggest you read Bowling Alone by Robert D. Putnam. Basically more diverse a society is the less successful it will be.
And yet the United States is one of the biggest world superpowers.
is the
it's one of
but it's also top dog
Only a sith deals in absolutes
Oh really? Don't think China and Russia are really "successful", unless you only count those leading counties
uh
This gives the bassics. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/presentation/c223/9e95b47d2285a6872412a1815c15ffb25e35.pdf
Texas has an economy larger than Russia.
They aren't that great to live in.
Armed forces and GDP nigga
Top
Dog.
Woof.
Sith.
Wow forma communist countries have shit economies.
Socialist counties in general aren't that great.
