Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 448310356713013249
that doesent make race a more powerful force of determining social characteristics
I think it is.
culture is formed from groups of people. It is completely unrelated to race.
i mean the problem is your wrong my dude
If it isn't then why is Liberia african and not western?
you can get different cultures from people of the same race just by changing where they live
like literally. the british empire was very different than the romanians, and different than the greeks, and different than the italians
I feel like I've seen this same argument take place a few times before...
if anything europe has become more hemogenious culturally since wolrd war 2 than its ever been sence the roman expansion
I know national cultures are different from civilizational cultures.
Culturally speaking yes Europe has done that but not demography.
i dont nessicaraly think its a good thing that europe is so culturally homogenous right now because it leads people thinking culture is not as signifigant (or much more signifigant as it really is) to race
if race came before culture, then Ben Carson would not exist.
I think the cultures of Europe should be preserved and to do that you need to have Europe be European demography.
assuming they are related at all
you dont recongize the extreme differences people who are tought to think differently by the society they live in can have with eachother
Gre I'm talking about trends and averages.
that doesn't work nearly as nicely with genetics as it does with culture
because what are the chances a black guy born in Detroit would assimilate so well and become so successful from a gene pool like that?
Europen culture behind the iron curtain survived because it still had Europeans their not foreigners.
We aren't dealing with one or two people we are dealing with millions of people.
im tired of this arguement, you choose to think as you do reguardless of reason or evidence. you attribute to race things which dont actually consistantly apply simply because you have some people who agree with you and you and they can both misunderstand the recent findings in genetics about the importants of race and overblow it. as a race realist myself aussie i dont think you actually understand anything about genetics except simple concepts lacking the nuance of statistics behind them that simply reinforce your own opinion. you think you know something, that makes you more foolish than someone who knows nothing at all
thats not how genetics work.
if i don't have the redhead gene, i cannot give birth to a redhead
I don't think it's going anywhere so we can agree to disagree.
also if you fuck a minorty population enough it will forget its not your ethnicity, just sayin
worked for the romans
GENETIC COLONIZATION
theres a reason theres so many white people finding out they have mixed heritige
wtf
white people really are the sluts of the human race
"both of his parents came from large families in rural Georgia, and they were living in rural Tennessee when they met and married. Carson's mother was 13 and his father was 28 when they married, and after his father finished his military service, they moved from Chattanooga, Tennessee to Detroit"
were more empathic than other genetic populations on average
"here they lived in a large house in the Indian Village neighborhood.[19] Carson's older brother, Curtis, was born in 1949, when his mother was 20."
it was a different time
sure sounds like the kind of gene pool that would produce the American dream black person by aussie's standard
also tennessee is hill billy country so
i know because im north of them
i know its hill billy country. so is rural Georgia.
actually georgia isint, its more swamp than hill