Message from @.B

Discord ID: 449235086492172313


2018-05-24 15:34:50 UTC  

true, but they wouldn't want to cut themselves off from a popular way of getting content. instead they will probably strike deals with creators. and thats fine

2018-05-24 15:35:04 UTC  

you guys are missing a lot of points on that idea

2018-05-24 15:35:18 UTC  

by all means, poke holes

2018-05-24 15:35:18 UTC  

videos without the community aren't worth much

2018-05-24 15:35:32 UTC  

how would you handle the comments, likes, etc?

2018-05-24 15:35:52 UTC  

its an upload tool, the videos will stay on the site

2018-05-24 15:35:52 UTC  

in theory, can add that into the tool

2018-05-24 15:35:58 UTC  

or that

2018-05-24 15:36:01 UTC  

if there's a content ID on one site, would you remove the video from everywhere and reupload?

2018-05-24 15:36:22 UTC  

what do you mean by that?

2018-05-24 15:36:48 UTC  

I mean, your video gets claimed on youtube

2018-05-24 15:36:52 UTC  

also, the comments would probably stay local to the video (i.e. on the host site) but can be made visible from one location for the content maker

2018-05-24 15:36:57 UTC  

would you change the video and reupload only to youtube?

2018-05-24 15:37:23 UTC  

well, you should always allowed customization.

2018-05-24 15:37:48 UTC  

so, say maybe you have several sites, but the video you made doesn't work with ToS of a few of them.

2018-05-24 15:37:58 UTC  

checkmark button for which sites you want to upload to at that time 😄

2018-05-24 15:38:14 UTC  

you wouldn't want to upload. to those sites. so this is always a possibility of individual upload.

2018-05-24 15:38:15 UTC  

uncheck those that don't need a re-upload

2018-05-24 15:38:52 UTC  

you can make an ID for the video internal to the tool, so it can keep track of all the different copies

2018-05-24 15:39:31 UTC  

need to reupload or edit? select which sites to do that for, and have the logic for the best method for those sites built into the tool

2018-05-24 15:39:51 UTC  

you do understand the lower value of having the community segregated across multiple sites, right?

2018-05-24 15:40:17 UTC  

they already are on different sites

2018-05-24 15:40:40 UTC  

most area already on youtube and twitter

2018-05-24 15:40:51 UTC  

I only use youtube, I would risk and say 90%+ of people are also there

2018-05-24 15:41:16 UTC  

true, but its never a good idea to only have 1 site

2018-05-24 15:41:18 UTC  

anything outside of youtube is irrelevant

2018-05-24 15:41:34 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/398973785426100234/449235520523075598/Displease.jpg

2018-05-24 15:42:08 UTC  

it doesn't matter if 90% of the traffic comes from one site. because if that site changes, that 90% could go away. if you have a back up, then you stand a good chance to get back that lost crowd

2018-05-24 15:42:13 UTC  

that is the problem this is aiming at

2018-05-24 15:42:54 UTC  

there's no platform that will be able to compete with youtube in the near future

2018-05-24 15:43:04 UTC  

no matter what tool you make, that won't change

2018-05-24 15:43:19 UTC  

sure it will, if youtube keeps shooting itself in the foot

2018-05-24 15:43:36 UTC  

there will be a rise of aggregators, but not of platforms

2018-05-24 15:44:04 UTC  

if there is no other platforms, then how can there a raise of aggregators?

2018-05-24 15:44:28 UTC  

the video content will still be from YT

2018-05-24 15:44:43 UTC  

@Grenade123 No one can compete with YT, It runs at a massive loss. The only way to take a share of the market would be for Amazon or such like to get involed.

2018-05-24 15:44:45 UTC  

so then the site serves no purpose

2018-05-24 15:45:13 UTC  

you make a site that tells people to go to youtube

2018-05-24 15:45:15 UTC  

why

2018-05-24 15:45:23 UTC  

>aggregator

2018-05-24 15:45:30 UTC  

to FIND what they want to watch