yes it was m8
yes in the long term
aryan your denile of facts makes it very difficult to argue with you. just tell me my mom is gay and be done with it
Industrialization occured in the north because of the cotton industry which by the way used free labour as well as slave labour.
It prevented the need to innovate, and used laborers that had no will to do a good job. 1 slave =/= 1 good paid worker
They we're rich because they owned most of the farm land for cotton, and everyone around them was still poor.
Most people who lived in the south didn't have the money to get slaves
to think that slavory, that thing that was one of the most profitable bussinesses in history that DROVE the industrial revolution in the united states. didint have any contribution to the national economy or development is fucking batshit insane
What industrial revolution happen in the south?
If you look at the numbers slavery was the worst thing to happen to the south. http://www.nber.org/chapters/c0606.pdf
nigga the entire country benifited off of slavery
theres a reason it took so god damn long to abolish it
No it didn't. It kept the south poor look at the numbers.
Why spend money on expensive machines and labor when you could buy slaves that could reproduce?
In the short term it allowed rich people to get richer and did Jack all to help the people of the south.
Just plantation owners
because you needed expensive machines and labor to produce products FROM COTTON PLANTATIONS
when you pick raw cotton its useless
you have to turn it into something, thats what the north's economy was based on
Yes, and the amount of cotton picked and speed at which it was picked was hampered by slaves
You needed more slaves to do less work
In the long term slavery kept the south backward. This paper shows that kids could pick 95% of the cotton that slaves could using the same mrthods the slaves did. http://www.econ.ohio-state.edu/trevon/pdf/Pres_Address_09-02-15.pdf
it wasent hampered because slaves are free after the 1st generation
I know slaves worked less hours than free labourers.
thats retarded
that didint happen, if anyone told you that they are retarded
It's true read this paper. http://www.nber.org/chapters/c0606.pdf
i dont give a shit what that paper says, use your brains
I'm using the paper as evidence to backup my claim.
no, use your brains
whats your superior iq for if you dont use it
what the fuck kind of sense does it make for slaves not to be worked more than free men?
My opinion is slavery wasn't good for most people in America let alone the country.
thats because you rather trust anything that supports your point rather than actually thinking for god damn once about what your saying
I agree it doesn't make sence that the slave owners did that but that is what they did.
Can you show me any papers that prove slavery benefited America?
time traveler aussiearyan over here. doesent know what the sun looks like but he knows what american slave owners did
Or other proof.
well all the things i already said
I've shown you papers that detail slavery compared with free labour in the cotton industry.
You haven't backed up any off youur clames Arch and I've presented evidence which contradicts your claim so why should I believe you?
