Message from @Arch-Fiend
Discord ID: 454109051773648926
something about inbreeding not being good and thats the only way to keep something "pure
@Grenade123 Sorry but that isn't true.
im sorry you dont think its true but youve already shown the african mixing. the middle eastern mixing is even more drastic, there is even some far eastern mixing in finland
Most human populations have enough people to prevent inbreeding so inbreeding isn't a problem.
and i mean middle eastern mixing before this last century too
greeks are VERY different than germanic peoples
theyve been fighting and fucking with anitolia and egypt for thousands of years
why do racists always link to poorly labeled charts?
why cant racists actually argue?
or know what a race is
who the fuck wrote this formal?
(1/(mixed))/(1/(not mixed))
that is so pointless, fucking simplify
if thats mathmatic its autistic af
[1-race]/[1-mixed] ffs.
a mixed race will eventually be its own race at some point too
that is why there is an other column
evolution doesent stop
given time any group of people is a group of people. thats why calling african americans "african" isint really a scientificly honest catigorization
wait....
so, that chart aussie linked, is single race / mixed race
which means a number > 1 means single race is more
so, for whites vs mixed:
the only < 1 number is gun easily available.
although, its [1 - rate for one race] / [1 - rate for mixed race]
or is that just for home interviews
fucking hell this is missing some much context
its literally just a chart with random numbers and declared to support not race mixing
to be honest i didint even look at those
fuck, is this what they classify as valid citation in aussie schooling? shit, and i though the US system was failing.
SJWs must have taken over there to classify shit this removed from context as valid
if a picture is just a bunch of words someone needs to tell me WHY i need to spend my time looking at it
i'm looking at the chart
which really is nothing more than a punch of numbers
oh im not blaming anyone for doing so. just explaining why im not
since [1 - rate for one race] / [1 - rate for mixed race] was specified just for the home interview
i don't know what these numbers mean
seriously, looking up odds ratio to try and get all the context explains to me that they use (a/b) / (c/d) rather than (a*d)/(b*c) which is much easier
this is why i hated statistics
bunch of people trying to sound smart when really they just liked things being needlessly complicated