around the edges atleast

something about inbreeding not being good and thats the only way to keep something "pure

@Grenade123 Sorry but that isn't true.

im sorry you dont think its true but youve already shown the african mixing. the middle eastern mixing is even more drastic, there is even some far eastern mixing in finland

Most human populations have enough people to prevent inbreeding so inbreeding isn't a problem.

and i mean middle eastern mixing before this last century too

greeks are VERY different than germanic peoples

theyve been fighting and fucking with anitolia and egypt for thousands of years

why do racists always link to poorly labeled charts?

why cant racists actually argue?

or know what a race is

who the fuck wrote this formal?

(1/(mixed))/(1/(not mixed))

that is so pointless, fucking simplify

if thats mathmatic its autistic af

[1-race]/[1-mixed] ffs.

a mixed race will eventually be its own race at some point too

that is why there is an other column

evolution doesent stop

given time any group of people is a group of people. thats why calling african americans "african" isint really a scientificly honest catigorization

it defines some of their origins, ignoring other origins

wait....

so, that chart aussie linked, is single race / mixed race

which means a number > 1 means single race is more

so, for whites vs mixed:
the only < 1 number is gun easily available.

although, its [1 - rate for one race] / [1 - rate for mixed race]

or is that just for home interviews

fucking hell this is missing some much context

its literally just a chart with random numbers and declared to support not race mixing

to be honest i didint even look at those

fuck, is this what they classify as valid citation in aussie schooling? shit, and i though the US system was failing.

SJWs must have taken over there to classify shit this removed from context as valid

if a picture is just a bunch of words someone needs to tell me WHY i need to spend my time looking at it

i'm looking at the chart

which really is nothing more than a punch of numbers

oh im not blaming anyone for doing so. just explaining why im not

since [1 - rate for one race] / [1 - rate for mixed race] was specified just for the home interview

i don't know what these numbers mean

seriously, looking up odds ratio to try and get all the context explains to me that they use (a/b) / (c/d) rather than (a*d)/(b*c) which is much easier

this is why i hated statistics