aussies argument in a nutshell:

The jews would be forced into a new country, discriminated against, and thrown into the poorest place in society. They then don't just sit there and be the lowest rung in society, they find something people want, and start selling it so they can get enough power to not be in the shittiest part of society. and the ruling people get jealous and go "how dare you not submit to us. how dare you be smart and clever and cunning" so they get kicked out again.

Nah i thinj his argument is that Jews takr the good stuff others make, then destabilize said maker nation so they fall below Jews

no, that is how he sees it

humans have been taking drugs since the first human got high

and its just one of many tools an invading force can use to subvert locals

take their favorite thing, declare it illegal, and use force upon those who don't quickly submit

Jews self segregate in their own area's these days when they aren't forced to. My point with that was that they were forced to by the goverment to try to deal with the problems Jews created like how your country forced blacks to live in their own areas to prevent places becoming like present day Detroit. It's not jealousy people don't like being fucked over. I agree that they have their interests which they can have in their own Jewish state. As I said it's not jews being smart that is the problem it's that they act like a parasite in non-jewish societies.

Sounds like minorities in the US, having black only events

Not just jews

I know all groups are like that when they are in a country which isn't theirs. For example blacks exploit your welfare system.

"but you see Jayred, we need to kick out all the people who don't look like us! they are clearly the problem! And then, when that doesn't solve the problem, we must find new people to blame so we can kick them out! and if that still doesn't work, then we need to blame the world and attack them!"

blacks exploit a system dems put in place specifically for them to exploit?

imagine my shock that people take stuff you give to them

Race is more than skin color mate I been over this so if you have any evidnce to prove otherwise then please share it.

turns out when you give people stuff for free, and keep doing it, they will not stop accepting the free stuff

Sure that's why New England is shit.

@Deleted User my point is you will keep finding new "races" to blame. since you never gave the exact set of genetic traits, and admitted that mixed race people are a new race. which means mixed race people mixed again are another new race. and keep going and going and going and now you have today

It's people if the people have bad genes the society will be shit, it's really that simple.

New England? you mean the north eastern states that are almost all dem owned like commifornia and all suck?

As long as they live in our countires they will keep us back.

Really New England sucks is that why they are some of the safest states in America.

https://www.usnews.com/news/best-states/slideshows/10-safest-states-in-america

Same for stupid people in general, lets get rid of the bottom 20% IQ people

So you support eugenics?

To a very certain extent

You want to pruge the bottom 20% IQ people, how else will you do that without eugenics?

People with hereditary diseases that are guaranteed to happen/cripple offspring for life

The 20% was a joke to show how silly it is, after you remove bottom 20% you get a new bottom 20%

I agree but keep that going forever mate. I want whites in the future to have as high a IQ as possible.

Very true if you prevent criminals from having kids you will have less crime in future generations and that is a bad thing how?

Crime is subjective

Oh, so we are going to breed humans like dogs then?

Murder is a crime that is not subjective.

Tell that to the government

Fbi, cia, clintons etc

Also, murder is subjective.

No i just want to sterilize violent criminals, and the bottom 5% IQ population.

I like that, keep sterilizing the bottom 5% percent.... Even me when I become that last 5%.

If you eliminate the 70 iq people, the 80 iq are the new bottom 5%

I mean random people who kill people you know the people who are sent to prison for killing people.

I thought you wanted to avoid the inbreeding problem

Random people who kill people is still subjective. The definition of murder is if it justified.