Also I find it hilarious that the Germans are getting state funded porn

@Radcliffe You really don't understand feminism. Feminism is just jews turning women against men by making women think their just like men.

@Deleted User what do you care, wouldn't you ban porn?

@0x90909090 Nearly 100 bucks, and it requires an adapter that isn't included? Either way, I'd need to see a substantial price drop before buying it. At this point, even a used one will have to wait - my Ninja blender bit the dust recently, and taking care of that situation comes first. 😁

I would burn porn like the Germans did.

What? Boring and uninteresting? Only state approved body types and positions?

@Grenade123 how kinky do you think the authoritarian government will be? because I need some kink

Its mandatory kink, which loses all meaning

State Enforced Homosexuality

Civil service anal entry

We're living in the 2070 paradigm shift

its a shit idea that wont have any ramifications

@PastamanXLII did you see the article saying that homosexual couple are 4 times less likely to have children? haha

I would've imagined that stat to be higher.

@Deleted User why are the 'inapt' women even on the diagram if not to make it look bigger and more threatening. Also why IS grace paley there twice.
Also I can see many feminists make the same diagram but replace the word jewish with white :D

Yes there are many white wemen who secretly want to be men hence why they are feminists. Saying feminism was created by white women because some white women support it is like saying communism was created by whites because some whites support it. The people in the Inapt category are just people who didn't write books on the subject or participate in feminist movements but were sympathetic to their aims. Thank you for pointing out that she was ther twice, I will correct that mistake.

Maybe you misunderstood me, to me, all of the people on that picture are white.

I checked some of them and know some of them, saying they 'supported feminism' is like saying the normie supported feminism. Of course most people who are not involved (read: normies) will say 'I think feminism is good cuz, like, women should have rights'.
I would say that graphic is bullshite, and have to support the claim of whoever made comments under their portraits. Calling 60% of them jewish feminists is just a far reach.

Look I understand where you are coming from but Jews are a racial/religious group which means that people like leon trotsky who was an atheist religiously is still a Jew because Jews aren't just a religious group.

Well sure the estimate of 60% might be a bit high but feminism is still jewish dominated and if you could show other wise that would be very helful.

Then make up a new word for them along with a sign other than the star.

Like what Kike because that is already a word used to discribe them. The thing is just making up a new word wouldn't help because they will still claim to be just a religous to the Goys (non-jews).

I really don't intend to show otherwise, my point is that if you post something you should at least not make it LOOK like it is something that it is not. That will only hurt the credibility of the underlying facts (ift hey are indeed there).

I don't quite understand what you mean there, I meant at least distinguish the religion from the people. Because if I convert to judaism it would not make me jewish from your point of view, would it? By not clearing that confusion up it is just hurting the talk about it. Which I suspect is intentional.

Regarding the prominence of jewish women in feminism. You have to show how many feminists are there in total to make a claim about how 'jewish dominated' feminism ist. Also there are other contributing factors to people other than their ancestors that influence career choice and world view. Especially in a group of people ('race' in this case) that has a uniting culture/religion.

Yes if you converted to Judaism from a civics point of view you would now be a jew and if I got American citizenship that would make me American from a civics point of view. It's blood that is what is important.

I will edit it hit enter by accident :D

Do what you have to do.

Yes, but using the same word for 'civic jew' and 'blood jew' is just stupid and hinders dialogue. Some people are doing the same fucking thing with moslems and arabs. Which is arguably more justified because in social context if you see and arab person you assume they are a moslem but if you see a 'blood jew' you assume they are white. Still fucking stupid to use the same word if ask me...

You clearly don't understand how jews work. It doesn't matter if you come up with a new term for jews they will still deny that they are a race to the goys. That is why it doesn't matter if we create a new term because the goyim aren't supposed to know they are a race.

Why does it matter if they are a 'race', that word is also something I think hinders the conversation. Point is, there is a tendency for certain traits like IQ (whether that is representative of actual intelligence or not) and interest certain branches of academia unite certain groups of related people, right?
And suppose the 'blood jews' actually 'don't want the goyim to know they are a race', why would you care what they want? Wouldn't it be in your interest then to make up a new word and not call it race in order to circumvent the 'jewish is a religion, not a race' argument?

The fact that jews are a race means they have their own racial interests like all races which is fine but the fact that they pretend they don't and they distory and parasite off the countires they nest in is a problem. We know IQ represents intelligence don't listen to Gould. With regrads to what they want it matters because in the last century they have done so much to confuse the goyim with the mass media most of which they control. I just call them jews because that is what they. All I have to do is disprove the misconception that they are a religous group.

If you want to understand jews and how they work I suggest you read Culture of Critique by Kevin Macdonald or if you don't have the time I suggest you watch this video which goes through some of the most inportant things they have done which is detailed in Culture of Critique. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eCkc-ZF_TSY

Well good luck with explaining to normal people how jew is not a religious category. I will stick with the option that confuses people the least and doesn't turn them away from the thin ice that is talking about genetics in context of intelligence (especially in regards to 'blood jews', which is a touchy subject altogether). Because there is a legitimate conversation to be had, but bringing anthing that remotely sounds like a conspiracy theory into this will destroy the ice.

Also arguing jews have done something is very close to arguing the white race suppresses the black race in the USA.

lol the parentheses around boas' students

Does that video contain swastikas?

I think most people on some level know jews are a different race but I think we can agree to disagree.

Not yet

Video is blocked in germany, so I most assume it does.

Alot of videos are blocked in Germany.