Message from @GingaBomber
Discord ID: 458497175064674328
The higher the IQs grow, the more existential your sheep become.
I think we dissagree about freedom for the race. I see it as being free from other races messing with us and you seem to see it as having democracy.
No, I see it as having dictatorship.
because there's no way that works without it.
I dissagree the Japanes have higher average IQs but they repect their goverment. Goverment isn't the problem it's who runs the goverment that matters.
Like I said, I dont like the amount of power given to the people who will oversee it
And cause their govt gives the japs alot of leaway
They also commit suicide at a much higher rate than the rest of the world.
Like they told the UN to fuckoff everytime they try to police their morality
Existentialism is a bitch.
There is a reason why the intellectuals are very few, they tend to be celibate or deviants for some reason
Not passing on the genes as much.
And the abortions
They tend to either overthink things to the point of neuroticism
I don't see how democracy can work. Having your leader chosen by popularty contest is a stupid idea.
Or they get lost in their vices.
We think its stupid too. But its the best people got.
That's why I'm damn glad we don't live in a democracy.
Representative Republic, bitches.
I kinda prefer republic however
In the end, a jury of 12 people, on rotation, determine the laws.
Well anything to prevent one small group from holding all the power to the point of corruption
I dissagree. I think having a faicst goverment which has a focus of the race on the national level is the best system.
I think having a small group of people holding alot of power is just going to happen so why not just have good people have that power?
Inversely, why not rebel against that?
Because it works.
Do we have a way to do that now?
Rebelling?
People are too volatile.
Absolutely it does.
Spread the idea around and wait for shit to hit the fan.
In a fascist govt, you are stuck with it forever.
Its too stable, to rigid to accomodate change
Yes I know.
And if the leadership changes, society will have to change faster than it can for the sake of them
You can have tests, whatever, a secret cabal, but even then those things can be infiltrated and corrupted.
Democracy can work in smaller countries, like finland.
And even AI is not infallible
Democracy, I'd argue, does require more heterogeneity.
pardon my spelling