Message from @Aktriaz
Discord ID: 463418054303285248
it's nice to have differing opinions
even insane ones
making a response to that,
We are sad because we are now even more of an echo-chamber
@Ghostler if you dont spam 10 screen caps of 4chan then its just not the same
lmao
yeah I was thinking of how to do that
self loathing helps
because I have work to do and keeping up with OC screencaps sounds hard
No. I don't have a loicense for that meme.
oh shit, AussieAryan left?
was he beaned or left by himself?
gonna ask him
I miss my fashyboi
he wasent fascist, he was natsoc
those are mutually exclusive?
I thought that facism was a very vague term itself, and natsoc was more specific
of course he never did do a very good job of explaining his vision of national socialism
its very hard to have socialism that isn't dictatorial or close to it.
particularly the types of things he was arguing for
if he didn't want to end up in the cross-hairs of his own ideology, he would need to have one person at the head, otherwise political opponents would weaponize the different pieces against each-other
well fascists beleive in nationalizing labor while socialists beleive in socializing it. nationalized labor would put bussinesses in control of government that the people would have democracy over and thus be able to directly effect the direction of power that corporation has while socialism usually does some degree of wealth and labor sharing amongs the employees of an industry
a degree of labor sharing coudl become so extreme that the entire country population is sharing the labor
well beleive it or not, the italian fascists had a democracy though its was one of those democracys no one was inspired to compete with any except the leading party
and were encouraged strongly not to compete with the ruling party
though it was also a time of war
russia has an election
they must be a democratic communist country
My argument against fascism in general was that no one should be trusted with that much power to have that much control over the populace.
And until we can find out the perfect human being, uncorruptible by power and completely virtuous consistently, fascism is out of the question.
yes
And that's why we need to make him
An AI?
Well I also argued that Fascism only works in a very rigid society.
yes
and yeah
trusting one person with that much power to have that much control over the populace has worked for humanity for 7000 years
usually because theres mischaracteration of a system where one person has full control over the direction of a nation that they have no responcibilty to the population, they CAN abuse that responcibility, but many cases where that occurs such rule does not contenue uncontested
Techno-facism.
did you mean "hasn't worked"
wewlad.
Technofascistfuture