Lgbt could say the same to us. Oh no you want to replace our tolerant culture with something that prioritizes heteronormativity. but what of the progress we have made. your logic justifies iconoclasm

i dont see your point

people in the world have different interests

and beliefs

and will always seek to replace their enemies beliefs or people with their own beliefs or people

Besides, Christians would have relayed the burning of their books, but they didn't. They told us about the cutting down of sacred trees and even the (very controversial) forced conversion of the Saxons, but they are silent on any pagan books that were burned.

Books were erased, back in the day, because paper was prohibitively expensive, so if a monk needed to write something down and he had no paper, he erased an older book he thought would be without value. Sounds barbarous, but if paper became as expensive as a car, we'd take up this practice in a stride.

@Korin Dickman lets just go back to the beginning here . you said christianity had a problem with universalism. the points you brought up were vague and even you yourself admitted you could not say exactly what you meant. so why dont you tell us what you meant

were just getting in the weeds here about paganism

Honestly just a question? What is the point of talking about this. Overall i see no fruit bore from this only conflect, All of you will not convince the other of a Issue you see within there logic. So if nothing can be reached there is no point.

All of you are quite well versed within these subject's, But you will get no were.

what does it mean to be anti universalist

Who are you asking?.

@Korin Dickman

@Skellington I see, you don't have to ping me twice

i was answering candaian man

Oh, alright.

@Skellington I try to formulate my thought in understandable manner and can't do it right now. I might return to this topic when I have more to say. Again, the simplest way I can describe what I have problem with is notion "As long as you are Christian... (the rest doesn't matter)". It might be just the how modern "Christianity" is presenting itself. Other then that I must concede here. There is no point in continuing this discussion when I can't properly present my idea so I admit surrender.

its more like so long as you are christ like and obey gods law. not so long as you are a christian

So what are your guys' philosophy leanings here?

I'm a hardcore Neo-Scholastic Thomist and a tradcat

Maxist Leninist hyper nazi anprim totalitarian

Oh

@RIP Skelly topkek

>anprim totalitarian

Yeah Pol Pot is my hero

wOw

kek

Okay then I am of the Neoretardist post-anglo empiricist school of thought

Techno-NeoHomosexualism

Im an anarcho-primitive futurist

I'm a techno-anarcho-primitivist

Bruh

thats crazy

Yes I'm waiting for the post-singularity Neo-homosexualist revolution

Gay sex in an anarcho-primitivist techno-singularity in space

In all seriousness though what the fuck are your guys' philosophical leanings

catholic.

@newtradist nice. Same here.

Non-denominational Christian

Interesting