Message from @Techpriest of house Roundeye
Discord ID: 697687397973884978
All of you are quite well versed within these subject's, But you will get no were.
what does it mean to be anti universalist
Who are you asking?.
@Skellington I see, you don't have to ping me twice
i was answering candaian man
Oh, alright.
@Skellington I try to formulate my thought in understandable manner and can't do it right now. I might return to this topic when I have more to say. Again, the simplest way I can describe what I have problem with is notion "As long as you are Christian... (the rest doesn't matter)". It might be just the how modern "Christianity" is presenting itself. Other then that I must concede here. There is no point in continuing this discussion when I can't properly present my idea so I admit surrender.
its more like so long as you are christ like and obey gods law. not so long as you are a christian
So what are your guys' philosophy leanings here?
I'm a hardcore Neo-Scholastic Thomist and a tradcat
Maxist Leninist hyper nazi anprim totalitarian
Oh
@RIP Skelly topkek
>anprim totalitarian
Yeah Pol Pot is my hero
wOw
kek
Okay then I am of the Neoretardist post-anglo empiricist school of thought
Techno-NeoHomosexualism
I'm a techno-anarcho-primitivist
Bruh
thats crazy
Yes I'm waiting for the post-singularity Neo-homosexualist revolution
Gay sex in an anarcho-primitivist techno-singularity in space
In all seriousness though what the fuck are your guys' philosophical leanings
catholic.
@newtradist nice. Same here.
Non-denominational Christian
Interesting
A post modern post reactionary
catholic
Post-reactionary?
Also nice you're based
Care to explain the post-reactionary part?
Its a bit long and complicated but alright
Its a bit of a meme term but I kinda use it as a place holder term for now. Essentially a post reactionary position comes from a couple of conclusions on the state of the world and more specifically Reactionary politics place within it. Of those conclusions some of the more important points are that Liberalism is the best form of government currently in terms of raw power acquisition and beating out any competitor ideology such as communism and Reactionary regimes, any sort of reactionary regime will always be in a significant disadvantage in most areas that actually matter such as raw industry, economy and government efficiency due to how they operate and the steps they would have to take in order to be able to resist liberal influences in the modern world. From there the general strategy of a post reactionary is not to compete with a liberal structure head on (even in the event of us actually taking power within a nation) but rather to attempt to cripple our adversaries to still remain relevant and not be outperformed
@RIP Skelly Interesting. So, essentially, you disagree with the "praxis" that most reactionaries would employ?
Is this similar to the fabian strategy? (the real one not the meme "always run away" one)
Or do you have any fundamental disagreements with regards to beliefs?