The English are the most famous for common law

A meta narrative isn't modernist perse, what makes a meta narrative modrrnist is that it tries to break with all that came before and be something new

narrative*

ok, I'll really be off after this

believing in natural law is modernist because natural rights are modernist and natural law implies natural right
1) Laws are the regulations of actions.
2) Actions cause things to happen.
C1) Laws are to regulate what happens.
3) To happen is to come into existence.
C2) Laws regulate what comes into existence.
4) Moral laws deal with oughtness.
5) Duties are actions which ought to be done.
6) Impossible things cannot be caused to happen.
7) See 1), 2), and C1).
C3) Duties must be possible.
8) Outcomes are attained through the fulfillment of requirements.
9) For a requirement to be fulfilled it must exist.
10) Rights are things which ought to happen.
C4) The requirements of duties ought to exist i.e. are moral rights.
11) The existence of certain requirements can be maintained and/or caused.
C5) There is a moral duty to maintain and/or cause those rights.
12) Positively, crimes are actions which ought not to be done. Negatively, crimes are the going-against of duties.
C6) It is a moral crime to violate those moral rights.

Or simply:
1) All duties are made possible through the fulfillment of requirements.
2) Duties must be possible.
C) There must be a right to the requirements which fulfill duties.

good night

tl dr

also i never got an answer @Bunyip is globalism modernist?

@𝐇𝖆𝖚𝖕𝖙𝖘𝖈𝖍𝖆𝖗𝖋𝖚𝖍𝖗𝖊𝖗 I'm not sure I would put Blackstone in the modernist era

Natural law doesn't implicate rights

you asked that? must have missed it

yes and no

Natural law is about thelos

to my mind it isn't strictly one or the other @Skellington

natural law is from god, it exists forevers

@Vulpes the point is telos is a right

Wut

F O R E V E R S

Thelos isn't a right

read the syllogism

Yes this is true.

Rights in it self arn't bad, you must see rights as it's proper thing. They are priviliges

But what I'm trying to explain is the fact that I wouldn't put Blackstone in the modernist era group. @𝐇𝖆𝖚𝖕𝖙𝖘𝖈𝖍𝖆𝖗𝖋𝖚𝖍𝖗𝖊𝖗

@Renown blackstone is my homie

Yes, he was quite the legal scholar

the man votes on BEHALF of the woman

What, hold on

That doesn't read right

u kno

Voting 🤔

women can't vote because the man votes on behalf of the woman

Anyone voting 🤔

Elections 🤔

What did he mean by this?

degenerate

The sylogism doesn't make sens

Ok, nvm

I read the sentence wrong.

Also, I'm going to bed so see you all some other time

peace out

anyways

👋