First thing he said in the recent one is that Nick is an incel

And Spencer is generally such a massive f*g

Cant stand his voice and demeanour

I think the show is pretty decent. Maybe his jabs at Fuentes are a bit distastefull but he spoke out against his banning

I find RS very insightful. But he is not entertaining at all.

spencer is gay

complete faggot

I like the dynamic on his new show

He's willing to think outside the box, which is too bad considering how much he fucked up

Yep

Spencer hates Fuentes and Casey because they are actually successful where he utterly failed. He only likes people who worship him because it's not about us succeeding to Spencer. It's about his ego.

Ive learned so many different perspectives from him, concepts that really make sense in the big picture.

But yeah, his personality quirks and ego are awful.

I didn't get that impression from him. He didn't seem to care about Fuentes all that much unless Fuentes was casually shitting on him or punching right from an American nationalist optics perspective whilst also making cookiecaust memes

Spencer definitely has a big ego

And as far as success is concerned I don't think he was concerned about Nick's success from a subscriber/viewership angle and he downplayed the importance of groyperism in his podcast

I could see spencer being a fed as well tbh

Possibly

It's not unlikely he was an informant

Not an agent

i can't stand listening to people who sound this gay for longer than a sentence

based

what the heck, why did my emoji just disappear

Richard Spencer comes from a completely different ideology than Nick. In fact, I don't know if he actually has a salient political stance. All his beliefs seem to center around grandiose abstract concepts.

More philosophical than substantive.

philosophy isn't substantive?

https://twitter.com/TheIllegit/status/1229958214612963328

what is this

Spencer has a pretty refined worldview
A sort of supranationalism

He disagrees with conservatism on economics etc.

i don't understand how college aged women could get this wrong

Substantive in the case I am making, is being translatable into action.

Or political action in this case.

Well he tried and failed because action for action's sake is dangerous

Very true

Groyperism in a way was similiar to Spencer's approach

Putting yourself out there

Not to mention the overwhelming crackdown from the established powers was quite jarring for the entire dissident right after Cville.

Of course the safer questioning of TPUSA types got eventually cut off since our opposition isn't retarded