Message from @McFansy
Discord ID: 685917465209077760
They're basically globalists lel
And ik. Hence why asked said it was random. Idk I'm just bored asl....
No
On a serious note: Chris Hansen; guy who stops child predators, charged with harassment
nah I exclusively visit servers where I hate and am hated
its this server and the fortnite server atm
Weβre having movie night πΏ
Watching Joker
Cuck > Joker
Dang I'm already watching a movie
All our guys in the comments
@clossington Gud choice
Just finished my fifth or sixth watching of it tonight
Itβs definitely one of my favorite movies now, as itβs really well done and is very rewatchable
@Norik I've been thinking lately. In particular on what you've told me on the social contract and Hobbes's framework for absolute monarchy. And I think I've come to a proper conclusion.
Organism, not social contract, is the true image of social reality. All parts of the social order exist in an interdependence that is organic, that can no more be idly reassembled through arbitrary action than can the parts of the human body.
There is no sense in which society is the product of man's free association, and equally there is no sense in which sovereignty originates or is a manifestation of a free act of the popular will. There is a purely logical sense in which sovereignty is founded on popular consent, in that, without some degree of popular loyalty to it, government would be impossible, but from any realistic viewpoint sovereignty derives God as the creator of man's social nature.
Far from some entity "the people" constituting government, it is impossible to imagine "a people" without a sovereign. The idea of a people involves that of an aggregationsl around a common center, and without sovereignty there can be no political unity or cohesion.
You could say here I echo Burke's view that "the people" has an organic unity not through any conscious decision on its own part, but through consolidating work of a "habitual social discipline."
Hello original sinners
I donβt have any
I would call myself opportunist
apolitical?
please no
oh no
why would an opportunist side with us
we have no institutional power
@Deleted User no seriously. what are your positions?
Well, i donβt want to take any
why
Hmm??
I prefer to serve for my interests only
That's certainly not something which a good statesman nor a good man would say.
Agreed, Lunius. Wouldn't it also be within your interests (personal or not) to help your immediate family, community, culture, nation, God, etc.?
Maybe you can strive for something more than being one among many, if you allow yourself to mature and see what social wisdom can do for you.
@EYEFORKNOWLEDGE156 Seriously?
What did I do?
I mean, I get the joke, but uhhh maybe you're stepping it up a notch?
Just trying to have a bit of fun
u said jew