Message from @Shad
Discord ID: 532954936464637952
Kek
<:NPC:500042527231967262>
kek
😂
```"It's not child porn if she's a 2000 year old dragon kin."
-Vee.```
vee does have a point though
i mean
if she is a centuries old mystical being, that completely negates that she looks like a child
I don't know why it needs to be said. If you are sexually attracted to a person that appears physically prepubescent, then you have a mental disorder. "Actually she's thousands of years old" doesn't change that.
Yep
thirded
What about mavis from hotel Transylvania?
She’s over 180 and looks 16
@Bookworm depends, what makes it hotter ? The fact that she is a thousands years old, and look like this, or the fact that makes it closer to a little girl ?
there's people who likes short women, who likes thin women with small breasts, and those two are fines.
But for a pedo what is exciting isn't the body, it's the age... And yeah, I could agree that it needs deeper look if you have a character that looks like a little child, and act like a little child and is sexualise but you claim that character is a billion years old...
16 isn't prepubescent is it?
You right I want to fuck her in bat form
well thats entirely different
9 in dog years is like, 50.
who knows about bat years
humans develop/mature absurdly slow compared to most other mamals
the whole `dog years` `cat years` thing doesn't really make much sense to me
I’d fuck a girl if she could transform into animals
Same thing, right?
r/shitTimsFansSay
make sure you put newspaper down first
you filthy degenerate
Oh you right
16 is not prepubescent, unless they have some kind of condition.
oh just read further back in the discussion
just
japan
why?
either those two nukes were too much
or not enough