How cringey and gay though?

> The post-war narrative of Hitler as the ultimate evil is from the perspective of the Jews. That's where the left gets its moral legitimacy. However, Hitler was also bad for Germany and the rest of Europe. He put them in a war that they lost and made bad decisions for his own prestige and not the wellbeing of Germany.
>
> From an ideological perspective, my opposition to National Socialism is that denies the imperfect nature of man. It tells people that they are the ubermench and that all their problems are the result of the JQ or some other outside force. It created egotistical and unbalanced individuals who ended up destroying the very thing they claim to be fighting for because they couldn't accept their own faults. Same can be said for NatSoc larpers today.
@Endeavour Nice. Thank you.

Your better off arguing from an ideological and metaphyisical perspective tbh. If you argue from the historical perspective hes just going to be able to hand wave it away due to the post war consensus and the suppression of alternative perspectives about the second world war

Arguing 1. Germany was responsible for or started ww2
2. Germany wasnt put upon by other powers or outside forces
3. Anything around the holocaust
will get you no-where do to the controversy surrounding these perspectives in history and modern NatSocs falling on the revisonist side of the argument

@EYEFORKNOWLEDGE156 @Tome_Enthusiast @Techpriest of house Roundeye
I'd say from a cultural perspective, the Third Reich is also unappealing. Literature like War and Peace, Oliver Twist, or All Quite on the Western Front resonates with me far more than something like Triumph of the Will. Stories that actually portray the human condition are far better than propaganda that just tells you that you're an ubermench. Likewise I enjoy the aesthetic of Victorian Britain or even Imperial Germany far more than the Third Reich. I believe that its ideological problems manifest themselves artistically as well. That's why I just find NatSocs so unappealing.

From Brest to Vladivostok, the Hyperborean homeland will be reunited

*ironic esotericism*

@Endeavour culture has to be natural from the bottom up

Not manufactured like the third reich

no

you cant totally rely on plebs

top down is ok, just has to be based in reality

but make your arguments

Is culture not top down tho

Both top and bottom needs simply to be on a same trajectory BUT both have distinct roles to fulfill.

culture as in ritualistic behavior and explicit ontology is naturally top down

bottom up culture is average ethnic temperament

you might have some bottom up cultural aspects created by environmental factors like food and clothing too I guess

Culture is downstream from politics. Bottom up is just reinforcement of the top-down.

@EYEFORKNOWLEDGE156 I don't agree. High culture comes from the top down. I have nothing against the elites promoting the arts as long as the art they promote is good.

I was half asleep when I made this comment and I managed to piss off half the server

@EYEFORKNOWLEDGE156 Don't worry about it.

Lol

I’m not
I just find it funny

Is there any way of interrogating newcomers before letting them in? There seems to be a lot of inactive newbs of unknown ideologies

it's easy to purge people who don't participate

if you are worried about that we can do periodic kicks

they can always rejoin if they were legit

That's why we require all noobs introduce themselves in the Canis Society. It's a super low bar, as we let in almost everyone, but you would be amazed how many people won't even make a one sentence effort.

What qualifies as activity?

posting

shitposting

purging works

just kick anyone who hasn't posted in the last month

what we use to do in the old DL

Hi I just joined. I recently discovered NRx, through a youtube conversation by a fascist and endeavour. I’m honestly just curious, and I wondered if anyone could answer my questions.

Thank you.

So, from my outside perspective, NRx sounds like a return to Edmund Burke like conservatism.

Yes, I think Burke was a whig. I’ll have to check later. He did, however, hate the French Revolution, and wish for an almost romantic return to tradition. As he saw it as having wisdom which the revolutionaries stupidly destroyed.

That’s interesting. I will definitely do some more research. I already know of charlemagne’s youtube channel, but I’ve only watched a few of the videos.

No