`Is it paranoia if they really are out to get you?`

each one of those examples pretty much required putting a group at the bottom, and telling everyone else to destroy them.

they didn't fix the problem of the welfare class by putting them to work, they fixed the problem by putting them to death.

they made a welfare class out of other humans. they made or relied on the existence of another group.

well the nazi's did, the japanese and fascist didint

Foreign suspect rates in germany 2017 for burglary

https://twitter.com/derhorus_x/status/1014867722088349697

Was australia not marked when you posted that thing like a day ago?

Also it would be enlightening to see a diagram that also takes into account how many people from each of these countries live in germany, there is most likely a reason why french criminality is up like that

@derhorus_

@LEER yes, in the cases of neighboring states overrepresentation are obvious. especially for western countries.

in the references you find the data for the population and suspects.

btw. to solve the problem one criminological study (only german) only took in account suspects with residence in one country Schleswig-Holstein. for non western neighboring states, the rates are still significant.

https://kfn.de/wp-content/uploads/Forschungsberichte/FB_137.pdf

pages 62-76

regarding the whole water debate thing... i have no idea how it turned into that by the way.... someone said that the US Post Office is a necessesary function of the govt or that we need it ran by the government for whatever reason. all i said was that -- no, why should it be ran by the govt when the market can take care of it just as easily (and better). theres no good reason why the USPS should be ran by the govt.... i ask you... or else what? you also said that the govt does not monopolize this service bcuz Fed Ex and UPS can also mail letters in the large package envelopes (while illegal for them to handle regular letter envelopes due to the govt holding an arbitrary legal monopoly over this mailing service for no good reason). so you basically admitted that businesses can handle the service just as well in the market so what is the point in prohibiting UPS and Fed Ex from delivering regular mail envelopes like the USPS does. seems like an unfair business practice if you ask me to stamp out any competition! the USPS should be privatized.... no reason for it to be ran by the govt. they should be forced to compete alongside other mailing businesses in a level playing field of market competition. looks like the USPS will eventually crash and fail regardless bcuz of the inherent flaws and mismanagement of central planning. the question is... should tax payers be forced to prop up a failing business.... absolutely not! PM me if you disagree

make no mistake -- the USPS holds an unfair, government-protected legal monopoly over the regular slips of letter envelope mail. Lysander Spooner challanged their market share by offering the same service at a fraction of the cost.... and was quite sucessful at offering the same service at a much lower cost... but guess what... he got shut down by the govenment! Squashed! bcuz well.... just bcuz!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Letter_Mail_Company

https://www.lewrockwell.com/1970/01/lucille-j-goodyear/spooner-vs-u-s-postal-system/

https://mises.org/library/usps-cursed-carriers

this is just common sense, people.... i dont see how this got twisted around to a debate about me defending your right to own the bottled water in your own fridge that you bought and paid for! i usually have about 15 gallons on hand of pure R/O water that i buy from a pure water store. that i don't own this water in the meantime before using it up or giving it away sure flies in the face of common sense -- nobody else would have the right to claim it without my consent. its funny how as if this water issue is somehow comparable to the unfair govt-protected monopoly of the USPS! its quite the non-sequitor.... the logic just does not follow. let me know if you disagree

is the water debate that thing sargon asked jared taylor in his interview of him?

iono, i was just reading some posts in the general discussion, and i was like.... "ahem.... excuse me, but i disagree [that the US Post Office is a necessary function of govt]"

and then SPLASH! water/property rights debate.... LOL

ah probably not then

speaking of Sargon I cant keep up with his server lol

not worth it to try

to many people talking at once

I wasn't willing to watch a 3.5+ hr video to get the address

yeah i can barely keep up with the general thread in the discussion there earlier heh

ive posted alittle here and there

true, so many overlapping discussions at once .... hard to follow who is responding to whom.... cannot imagine how crowded Sargon's channel must be

I joined when they where creating it, now that was an amazing shitshow

I'm guessing it's about as organized as this one was until recently

ima move to <#463054787336732683>

also i think that theres a few good reasons to have a federal postal service, for one in the us atleast its one of those few socialized services that competes with private bussiness just enough that private bussinesses always have a compatition but are never squashed under by the federal system. also one must ask, if theres no federal system, if you have your package lost by postal, is it theft? see the government cant steal from you but additionally the government must follow the same rules as corporations when they compete with eachother but that also means that corporations gain some of those benefits, thus neither fedex, ups, or the postal service can technically steal from you

wow, a lot to unpack from that statement lol. definitely disagree though 😉

I'm amazed that this debate that I accidentally started this morning is still going 12 hours later

for all sorts of reasons.... regular businesses get undercut by the govt services so too hard for them to compete... businesses dont hav ethe power to tax, only to persuade consumer to choose them, but the govt doesnt care bcuz it will tax regardless, and if its doing a poor job, well it will just tax more and cry and under funding, when in a normal functioning business, it would just go under if it cannot sustain itself economically, and that is a good thing, all in the name of correcting and recorrecting the best means of allocating resources, etc. but the govt does not have these sorts of input/output indicators, nor do they run on the same incentives as businesses, in fact gov services are incentivized to do a worse job because they will be rewarded with more money if they perform poorly, so the incentivce structure are completely backwards perverse in the govt structure

you should meet aussiearyan

Oh, I've met aussiearyan

i debated him once for 5 hours, went to sleep, he was still arguing with people when i woke up

a full 8 hour sleep

I tried to moderate a debate between him and somebody else once.

3 hours later I said "Sorry, but I've got to go. Try to be civil, everybody"