Message from @ExceptionalFeather

Discord ID: 470701495566860288


2018-07-22 21:08:53 UTC  

Including their wages

2018-07-22 21:09:23 UTC  

So they should want people to pay off debt so they dont go bankrupt you would think

2018-07-22 21:09:55 UTC  

Sure but that comes out of monthly expenses

2018-07-22 21:12:01 UTC  

Interest though

2018-07-22 21:12:23 UTC  

Doesn't matter as long as everyone keeps receiving cash

2018-07-22 21:12:49 UTC  

The inverse would actually promote collecting debt

2018-07-22 21:13:53 UTC  

Like if the government said "nah you owe 300k in student loans for your queer feminist butterfly studies degree, pay us less" why wouldn't people spend beyond their means?

2018-07-22 21:14:21 UTC  

"Oh if I put myself in debt I go down a tax bracket"

2018-07-22 21:14:29 UTC  

I'm not promoting any policy per se

2018-07-22 21:14:33 UTC  

Sure

2018-07-22 21:14:44 UTC  

I'm just saying its opposite would be hilarious

2018-07-22 21:14:49 UTC  

ye

2018-07-22 21:15:01 UTC  

But should debt be ignored all-together?

2018-07-22 21:15:21 UTC  

Basically yeah

2018-07-22 21:15:33 UTC  

I mean you can declare bankruptcy if it gets to be too much

2018-07-22 21:16:42 UTC  

How does bankruptcy effect tax revenue and economy as a whole on macroeconomics?

2018-07-22 21:17:01 UTC  

I'm not sure actually

2018-07-22 21:17:21 UTC  

Like obviously if everyone is forced to bail on their debt it fucks things up

2018-07-22 21:17:36 UTC  

But one or two people is probably fairly negligible

2018-07-22 21:19:41 UTC  

If it was only a couple wouldn't be as bad

2018-07-22 21:20:46 UTC  

This is also why banks are supposed to be responsible though

2018-07-22 21:21:31 UTC  

"supposed to be"

2018-07-22 21:23:38 UTC  

banks in general are responsible cuz they can't afford to lose money

2018-07-22 21:24:18 UTC  

Unless they get bailouts

2018-07-22 21:26:56 UTC  

yes thats the issue

2018-07-22 21:27:06 UTC  

if the state covers them they can be reckless

2018-07-22 21:28:41 UTC  

Too big to fail is a scam

2018-07-23 15:03:03 UTC  

It's not a scam, it just means they're too big. If they're too big to fail they should be broken up.

2018-07-23 15:36:20 UTC  

It means they get bailed out on the taxpayer's dime when they fail

2018-07-23 15:51:22 UTC  

tehn tehy didnt fail did they XD if they got bailed out

2018-07-23 16:00:18 UTC  

Well if they didn't fail where did the money go?

2018-07-23 16:16:02 UTC  

they failed, and in order to not cause so much chaos, the government uses tax money to cover the losses so the company can try again

2018-07-23 16:20:40 UTC  

yeah bullshit liek if it was a gouvt intisution

2018-07-23 17:05:06 UTC  

You can always fail

2018-07-23 17:05:18 UTC  

You cannot be too big to fail

2018-07-23 17:05:53 UTC  

Most of the banks that were "too big to fail", and investment companies? Yeah, they had to get bailed out.

2018-07-23 17:06:55 UTC  

Mostly because they had all of the retirement funds for the government employees

2018-07-23 17:07:18 UTC  

So of course they too OTHER people's money to save their money

2018-07-23 20:44:39 UTC  

As much as i dont like bail outs

2018-07-23 20:44:52 UTC  

They do have to pay back the money