Message from @Lagomaster24
Discord ID: 476200120048680971
well the harder i would push my beliefs on people, the bloodier it would be i suppose
Rarely is there ever a revolution that occurs without bloodshed.
I mean, I guess Canada got theirs peacefully just by asking politely...
not a revolution
that was essentially just a break off
A relocation or elimination of power.
how bloody was the industrial revolution?
tru
i guess its the matter of type
hundreds of thousands.
i mean in a sense it WAS bloody
cause no labor laws and stuff
maybe you cant think of the bloodless revolutions because they were silent and not really emphasized
the crypto-anarchists believes that technology will drive the anarchist change and that it's inevitable that the state will lose governing control over the masses
Sounds like a load...
Also ive wanted to ask about justice in anarcho societies
Innocent until proven guilty i assume
and some ancaps believes that agorism is the path to change, to just make it very easy for people to evade trading laws
But what replaces the court system
but at the same time the ideals of those periods where used to justify war and stuff sooooo
well if you read the crypto anarchist manifesto, they do have some interesting points, but yeah i have doubts too
Those are revolutions in thinking, not political revolutions
which means they cause more significant change
Not relocation of power
as someone whose essentially larped an anarchic situation, a state of some sort always ends up forming anyways
political revolutions just seem to replace bad guys with other bad guys and everything goes back to the same after a couple of months
Expand upon that lago
people like to organize
Anarchy requires the removal of Hierarchy in any form it takes.
Hierarchy is a law of nature.
nah, maybe ancom
ancaps are pro hierarchy, ironically
thats why ancoms dont think we are real anarchists
So how do you control the hierarchy?
It's also the idea that working together we can accomplish more that what we could alone, I'd say that's another reason states form
how do you keep it from polarizing and/or becoming tyrannical?
I participate in a Airsoft Apocalypse game twice a year and despite the perceived anarchy of the game world, players always organize into groups, settlements, and factions with at least basic rules among members.
first step: dont believe in the legitimacy of the tyranny
second step: dont participate in the tyranny