Message from @RyeNorth
Discord ID: 476208875092312074
or post an hour long video and say this video explains everything or some shit
and it's some Jewish Question for Beginners video
(The guy was alt-right)
TLDR - If you stare at shadows on the wall but refuse to acknolwedge that something creates those shadows on the wall you are dumb. Once you understand that something blocks light to create shadows you will be wiser.
nah i was just trying to explain culture determining society
and how people are born into culture and it determines their perspective on society
we take the status quo for granted
doesnt mean its the natural order of things
humans are like water, if you put water in a cup the water gets the form of a cup
Every single AnCap problem that is brought up has an easy answer within a constitutional state.
didnt you try that?
Right? For debate I'd shy away from videos and images to do my job for me as well.
It wasn't what I was doing either, I understand how it could seem that way though. 😬
Bulba: wasn't accusing you of doing that, was just saying I wasn't going to read it. 😛
Okay, no worries.
What do you guys mean by AnCap?
Anarchy plus Capitalism
I.E. your standard issued Anarchy starter set
with a Private Property expansion bundled in.
By an cap I mean corporations control everything IE belgian congo
AKA - no hands zone
Mostly.
by ancap i mean the private sector can do better than government employees who dont have to worry about losing customers if they do a bad job
Oh, absolutely!
Okay
We're on the same page, there! That doesn't mean there's not a place for the State.
hey if you can have a state without taxation thats 1/2 goals completed
You can't have it without Taxation at all
why not though?
For the same reason you can't have free roads.
cant you just have user fees or whatever they were called
i heard andrew napolitano say that original government didnt really have taxes, they just charged for land use
I mean, yeah. You're mostly not wrong.
The key of opposition is taxation without representation
Something you're opposed to as well, I'm sure.
That's why a top-down federal government is all wrong.
The (U.S.) states are nations in their own right, with their own constitutions.
would you agree with abolishing the federal government altogether and just have the states?
The only stipulation is that the US constitution is above it, to protect the individual.
If that were the ultimate decision, I wouldn't be entirely opposed.
nice