i need glasses, so either way the shape is more blurry for me

But if nothing is real, then what are glasses?

What if everyone's favorite color is the same

they are invisible to mirrors

We just call them different names

It turns out everybody in the world just percieves the same shade of gray as different colors and they all happened upon it as their favorite?

no, since we aren't sure if our colors are the same and I like my blue and you like your red

but your red is the same as my blue

That's what I was meaning to hint at

then ya

im still trying to understand jaden. you only know for sure what you can see with your own eyes. but you cant see your eyes with your eyes so you cant confirm they are real. so how can we trust our mirror reflection with our eyes if we cant confirm that our eyes are real?

we would have to trust our eyes with the reflection before we can confirm that they are real to begin with

its not a strong foundation of logical deduction

jaden could just be a rigorous logician.

by the way do you think insanity is a trained skill?

@NativeInterface would ancap be totally against tax on goods?

indirect taxes that is

yeah, it's against any 3rd party who interjects and demand fees and expect compliance without consent

if i can't do it, the state can't do it

if i cant tax your goods, the state cant tax my goods

because equal rights

The key point being compliance. If it's voluntery, then yes.

If it's voluntary it is called insurance

Or is a type of insurance

I can agree with that. Whatever vehicle voluntary travels in gets us to the same point

Anyways. If there are more workers than needed in a society, then the employers, assuming there are no regulations or close to none, are going to exploit that (human nature) . However, I think the inverse is also true, if there aren't enough workers to go around the workers are gonna exploit that. Employers are always working to make things more efficient and at least long term, reduce the number or workers necessary as a consiquence (spelling?) so even if we would make it so that there is a job for everyone and no more or less (let's assume for the sake of argument that everyone are equally good for each job) that equilibrium will sooner or later be thrown out of balance so arguing for such a society is unnecessary

What can be done about that to remove exploitation from either side completely and that is sustainable (to come with new regulations for each little thing is not sustainable imo, you're welcome to try and change my mind)

I am aware that it might be necessary to create other problems in order to reach that, but I am not interested in that atm. Just if there is any way to reach the relationship between worker and employer that I mentioned.

A related problem is how long should an employer be aloud to "force" a worker to work. As long as there are more people without a job the employers are going to reduce wages so workers will have to work longer (assuming no regulations are in place) in order to afford to live (the minimum wage debate).

attempting to remove extremes is always going to be a receipy for deseaster

life is constantly in flux and the amount of force required to maintain an strict status quo is usually frowned upon. it is better to make a society in which all people in it have the power to pull the pendulum back in their direction

this way when things start to get too close to one extreme or the other, the opposite side will be able to galvanize and pull things back towards them

thus things will fluctuate around the desired balance point, and most of the time be within some acceptable deviation for most people in the system.

I concur

Generational Pendulums

One for every issue no matter how minor

Sometimes they sync up

Sometimes the gay bot stops me from speaking

lmaoi

so when mao has pendulum hitler should be able to pull it back, so that everyone can commit genocide their own way

everyone wins