easy.
libetarians have no ways of fighting against subversion.

there isnt an exception. thats why its so important

you dont have the right to harm others

others dont have the right to harm you

you have the right to self defence or the defence of others

wtf is your school teaching you?

ill probaly just wright that thee is no case in witch that its okay to violate it worst case its a single lost point

its a bioethics classs and we are focusing on autominity

you cant preemptivly harm people. it has to be defence

otherwise thatd be every killers defence in court

yeah there is no example i can tink ive asked like 5 diffrent people for help

no one can think how to prove it wrong but my professer bs

sorry mate, i may be showing my age here but is your prof a marxist?

he very well could be

because the only way to violate it is to state that the collective is more important than the individual

would not susprise me

and that goes against the core of the principal

ill make it work we will debate it in class and prove it true

so you got 2 choices. answer the question correctly and risk being marked down or write some marxist colectivist bs and get points

good luck mate, i dont envy your position

these are one point HW. he dosent even read them as far as i know just makes sure you wrote something. i can mention collectivism and how its still wrong

Just mention the standard thing, to prevent harm to others is the only time when harm should be done

Say preemptive counter strike.

@toastermuffin follow Shapiro advice here

thank yall for the help ill be sure to make the best of it as i can

Be on the republican underground

Join YAF or something. But always wear a face mask lol

You should become Jeffersonian Republicans

cough cough the Louisiana purchase is unconstutional

@toastermuffin ssssshhhh

We don't need to relitigate the Louisiana purchase. Last thing we need here are the fuckin french.

didnt say its a bad thing

Just. Yaknow?

Just don't tell them

😉

The US constitution gives no explicit direction on the acquisition of territory

besides do you really want that land to be part of the British Empire?

no you don't

therefor it is left to the individual states not the goverment

There were no established states in the Louisiana purchase

yes and the land should have ben purchased by individual states not the fed