Strong backbone of tradition allowing leaders to train the next generation.

would that work on a modern scale though? we're talking millions, if not billions of people.

we're talking about ONE man, ruling all these people. sure, in smaller communities one bad leader can be ousted in a single night, but one such a large scale, with entire mechanized military and peacekeeping (and a presumably unarmed civilian population, as is a given with authoritarian regimes). The only way you're getting rid of that guy is a "lucky accident" or a high-raking coup.

plus the church was never a nation state. at most it worked in tandem with royalty and nobility. they could govern small towns (to and extent) but not kingdoms and certainly not nations

Ah, I'm not sure about leaders on that scale yeah. Cults of personality are fragile anyway.

`the free development of all of the forces dormant it this race.`
what part you have problem of understanding?

it dont need to be absolute dictator who cant be voted out.
and its not just one person who makes all decisions.

and church is pretty good way of ruling. but current christianity is degraded to so low level that it doesnt even serve purpose anymore.

And youth programs to train and find new leaders.

first off, what do you mean by "dormant forces"?

I literally have no idea what you mean. The fact that you are oblivious as to why just shows how far gone you are

what are the "forces" dormant within me? am I secretly wizard, but da joos are holdin' me back with their damn jew hexes?

what even

Maybe he meant the matrix

state must allow us to develop to the technological and well every aspect of life and society as high level as we are capable of.

i dont understand how thats some how contriversal or anything.

and just look at current society. it degrading fast in to degenerates. and torwards white genocide rly...

barring technology, there is no way to properly scale society by "levels". such a method would be completely arbitrary to the one doing the scaling (you). technological advancement is the only real way to rate a society's "level".

have you heard of the Rat Paradise experiment?

I can sum it up if you haven't

yes i have.

prosperity leads to degeneration.

whatever utopia you have dreamed up will ultimately spawn the antithesis to itself.

have you heard about marxist subversion.
because thats exactly whats happening.

yuri bezmenov summs it up pretty well

yes, and if it wasn't marxist subversion it would be something else (probably identical or similar)

_probably some retarded ethnonats who'll end up buried by the same system they put into place_

same shit, different pile. society will degenerate. it's just a matter of when, how slowly, and who'll burn it all down, and who'll off the guy who burned it down and then establish something that might be good or bad. the human struggle continues.

...ah, my nihilist misanthropy is getting the better of me.

say, what are your thoughts on genetically engineered superhumans? if your ethnostate somehow manages an authoritarian system but with untamed scientific advancement, it is a logical conclusion that someone would eventually try to improve upon the creature called Man.

would you bow before this new race of superhumans, or cling to the mythos of the white race?

thats kind of the reason you need authoritarian state. to stop that subversion.
in "liberal" society there is no ways for stopping it.

ethnonats want to healthier society and continue their race.

*black pills are bad mkey*

interesting question.
do you mean cyborg kind of stuff
or genetic manipulation.
if its genetic. it would be essentially same genes. but just weed out bad genetic mutations. like genetic diseases.
but that can get out of hands pretty easily...

Not cyborgs, but I'll admit I was being unfairly vague.

lets go with the unobvious versions.

a built-from-scrap human. lab created cells, grown in a vat, into a creature that is human by all means but genetic.

that would make them new race of people.
and there for not my people nor my race. so ofc i wouldnt allow that.

hmm, interesting. say, at what point would it become a new race?

say, if 50% of the cells in the body were designer cells, but the rest are natural?

where would you draw the line?

we share like 97% of genes with bigs.
but i get what you mean. its actually almost same question as now with immigration and "what is white" debates.

genetic differece is measured in Fixation index (FST)
like for example largest distance between europeans is 0.0667 FST
and distacne between europeans and africans is 0.23 FST

but basically thats just paradox called "loki's wager".

But the genetic different couldnt be that big. before it becomes different race.

Yo, your country is so fucked

How bout we don't look at race

Im an ashkenazi jew and im stupid

btfo nazis

Its jews who are claiming that ashkenazi jews have high IQ. But some how israels IQ is 95, *i wonder why*🤔

`How bout we don't look at race`
Thats very swedish beta cuck to say indeed.

Israel has more than just Ashkenazi Jews in it.

It’s like 25% non Jews with a majority of those being Arab and of Jews there are lots of Mizrachi, Spharadi, and Ethiopian Jews.

36% of population is ashkenazis

Yeah so that would lower the average IQ.

lol, was "Loki's Wager" ever cited by name in all that time when people were meming "Read Loki!" after the Sargon vs Spencer debate on Warski Live?

why is a woman, who had been "sexually assaulted", called a survivor?

i mean if she got her ass grabbed multiple times, she would still be called a survivor?
that's like calling someone a car crash survivor, who dented his car during parking.

it's easier to manipulate you, it has more punch than just 'victim'

also it helps in erroding the difference between rape and other forms of sexual assault

in my opinion that is

yeah so going up to a woman and saying, "hey wanna fuck", might end up in a ONS, in a relationship, or she might turn into a "sexual assault survivor"