Message from @Joe_Limon
Discord ID: 498237965382713344
Yeah so that would lower the average IQ.
lol, was "Loki's Wager" ever cited by name in all that time when people were meming "Read Loki!" after the Sargon vs Spencer debate on Warski Live?
why is a woman, who had been "sexually assaulted", called a survivor?
i mean if she got her ass grabbed multiple times, she would still be called a survivor?
that's like calling someone a car crash survivor, who dented his car during parking.
it's easier to manipulate you, it has more punch than just 'victim'
also it helps in erroding the difference between rape and other forms of sexual assault
in my opinion that is
yeah so going up to a woman and saying, "hey wanna fuck", might end up in a ONS, in a relationship, or she might turn into a "sexual assault survivor"
or a slap 😃
"Ayy bb u wan sum fuk" confirmed Kavanaugh quote. #resist
>he would ask
>bobs and vagene
milk truck has arrive
Oh man
The tears of the libs empower me
Roboute kavanaugh has been revived and the god emperor marches on hill capital
Its gonna be a good year
The reps could hold the senate and house
Hope is alive
Bahahahhaha
They are eating each other already
I hope they hold the white house
Fuckin dems are authoritarian
YEs
So I've been wondering, how could the SC revert Roe v Wade? Who would bring a case to the SC to change it?
well, there would have to be a case that gets appealed that far tbh.
I am not sure there will be though.
"democrats are the party of crime"
From who? A father that doesn't want a woman to have an abortion?
Likely it's to be persons vs. States who enact laws restricting it
Eliminating roe v wade simply means each state can decide its own abortion laws.
Can't they do that at the moment? The SC can't just decide the a decision no longer applies can they?
afaik technically it can be overruled if it get before the SC again but not just on a whim
at least that's what I heard..i'm far from educated on US justice system
yes.
They have to have an actual case to decide come to them before overruling Roe vs Wade
@Joe_Limon The courts can also rule in the opposite direction that there's a right to life, at least in so far as they can't intentionally terminate it.
It's true they can reverse it, just look back at separate but equal which was later reversed as not being true. To bring it before the courts however for such a judgment you need to argue either that the supreme court hadn't considered a particular argument or couldn't conceive of it being used in "x" way.
Jews have very high IQ I am a jew and I am at 180
oh shit 190