I don't mind discussing actual opinions. But you dropping a link and saying that I am stupid for not reading it. Is like an sjw refusing to read a link to a fox news article.

I'll bring the popcorn

All I will say is that the second biggest terrorist attack on US soil after 9/11 was a Christian Identity Warrior, Timothy McVeigh. Beyond that, I'm not really familiar with the statistics. I will say the big events of late were not derived from the American polar political ideologies. Orlando, Las Vegas, all the school shootings...none of it was left/right stuff.

There were lots of left-wing attacks in the 60s and 70s as part of the weatherman movement, but they were generally ineffective.

Small bombs, arson, etc.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Weatherman_actions

True

My alma mater was hit by PETA while I was there. Trashed a lot of offices and released a bunch of rodents to starve in the wild. I had to help clean up the mess. Have I mentioned yet how much I despise PETA?

No human died, but a lot of small mammals did. Way to go for ethical animal treatment.

At least when I sacrificed furry things to science I was fast about it.

One sore point for conservatives is that many of the prominent figures in the weathermen ended up being accepted back into society and have risen to positions of respect.

Actually, that has been a mind blower for me.

We have locked up so many people for petty shit.

But if it has the right narrative, you can basically be a terrorist and even get a posh position at some lefty university.

Or be on the board of a NGO or something.

Yeah, the non-profit industrial complex is cancer.

It's basically a bunch of people who got together, who had no marketable skills, who make money by being victims.

I know them very well, because I used to be part of those groups, in my spare time.

When I saw how fucking unethical and unhinged they were, I released a lot of shit they were doing to the public.

Some say that the most recent converts out of an ideology often times hate their prior ideology with the most fervor - that definitely applies to me.

@Joe_Limon this is not a matter of opinion. It’s a mater of hard fact

"It's a fact that you don't like to read"
Sure is good faith in here

Yeah, things got kind of venomous.

"I don't need to watch the video you linked because I already know my link is better"
Real honest and factual

Another source https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2017/08/18/president-trump-wants-facts-right-wing-extremism-here-they-are-erroll-southers-column/577308001/

You check his link yet?

@Beemann I will watch a specific video, not an entire channel

Fair, @Joe_Limon got a specific video citation?

Oh look, Google provides: https://www.adl.org/news/press-releases/adl-report-says-us-deaths-linked-to-domestic-extremists-second-only-to-year-of

You’re probably going to tell me google is biased

" The fatalities reported last year include 49 people killed in the June 2016 shooting spree at the Pulse nightclub by terrorist Omar Mateen, who pledged allegiance to ISIS and referred to the Boston Marathon bombers during the attack"

Google *is* biased. They fix your search results. This is documented my dude

So, yes, we will continue to endeavor to speak truths.

https://www.newamerica.org/our-funding/our-funders/

Open Society Foundations
$1,000,000+

Jennifer and Jonathan Allan Soros Foundation

Yes, Soros donates a lot of money. Just like CATO is coche funded. This is normal

>didn't address how his link undermined his point and proved a critic right

It’s not grass roots but it’s not biased either

I don't know man, it certainly calls its objectivity into question, and that's before you even crack the spine.

Which Beemann did and is apparently finding some problems.