Wait, how'd the Malheur guys end up dead? I hadn't heard of this.

Tried warfare with gorillas most likely

Their are enough guns and men to escort trucks, set up road blocks. I don't think it would take long for the Left to give up or die trying.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LaVoy_Finicum#Death_during_2016_refuge_occupation

I thought one of the Bundy family was killed as well but I appear to be mistaken

See, Spooky, your mistakes are 2 fold: (1) how would people be sufficiently motivated to risk getting shot at and being arrested (2) Who and how are people going to just collectively decide to set up roadblocks.

Atkins understands this much better.

We were talking if light terror starts to become a much more common occurrence.

People will get sick of it.

Like in Tims vid about the HQ being shot up. If that happens more and the cops don't do anything then the people will do someting.

Has Tim ever voice opinions about Secular Talk, I'm so conflicted with Kyle nowadays.

I've never not been conflicted with Kyle

But on the subject of potential civil war/destabilization of society, nationalist Terrain Federation equivalent when

Don't get your hopes up, history is a story of centralization and decentralization. Right now we are nearing the end of the age of globalism.

Globalism lead to the mass centralization of culture and wealth in the hands of a few, once the EU falls and things start falling apart there will be mass decentralization and geopolitics might return to something akin to a pre League of Nations climate.

What part of that undermines my "hopes"?

Or was that aimed elsewhere?

A global government is undesirable

Too much compromise in policy would have to be achieved in order for it to work, and such compromises would make for a sub-par system.

"pre League of Nations climate" Um, so WWI or WWII?

Before the Great War.

Meaning lots of wars

The post WWII world has been the most conflict free in history

Yes

The current system the West is in was put in place in fear of Soviet aggression.

The United States funded the current world order to ensure peace and stability and to limit Soviet expansion.

Not initially

No, early on it was to help with reconstruction.

Exactly. And to avoid another German War.

Or perhaps more accurately, European War

I wasn't talking about a global government, I was talking about a nation-equivalent

The principles are the important part, not the size of the society

Once the EU falls when an inevitable recession hits the United States should return to a policy of isolationism and concern ourselves with North and South American politics.

We can lend-lease to former EU ally states but we shouldn't become belligerents in foreign wars unless there is a global threat again like the Nazis or Soviets.

I would also cut ties with China and watch as their entire economy falls apart while moving industry back home and to other American nations.

Exports to the US alone make up approximately 12% of their GDP.

And in total exports make up approximately 40% of their GDP.

Tbh I wouldn't mind the commonwealth becoming a proper trading bloc, as a leaf

I agree

Rescue the UK from Europe

The entire anglosphere would benefit from increased solidarity.

If anything the Commonwealth is slipping more apart.