Message from @Cody

Discord ID: 507912964087611422


2018-11-02 13:39:07 UTC  

now, i just put in clarification

2018-11-02 13:39:08 UTC  

Yes its human life

2018-11-02 13:39:28 UTC  

It's just not gonna live.

2018-11-02 13:39:49 UTC  

well hold now

2018-11-02 13:40:12 UTC  

The question confused me at first

2018-11-02 13:40:41 UTC  

If either a sperm or fertilized egg are removed from the female body at any point, they will not result in human life (as defined by needing to be born)?

2018-11-02 13:40:48 UTC  

My response is that it is human life. But does not have a chance to grow more than it already has.

2018-11-02 13:41:28 UTC  

that wasn't a question if it was or was not, i'm just saying for the purpose of the question, birth is the min level of development where basically everyone agrees it is human life

2018-11-02 13:42:02 UTC  

I disagree with that premise.

2018-11-02 13:42:12 UTC  

i know you do

2018-11-02 13:42:25 UTC  

if you want me to say "born baby" rather than human life, i can from now on

2018-11-02 13:42:52 UTC  

But if it was never in a womb to grow, how can it be born?

2018-11-02 13:42:55 UTC  

but i'm trying to find out how far back on the development track we can go while both in agreement.

2018-11-02 13:43:02 UTC  

That's why it confused me at first

2018-11-02 13:43:26 UTC  

it can't, hence why it can't be human life, or reworded, can't be a born baby

2018-11-02 13:43:42 UTC  

That makes no sense

2018-11-02 13:44:01 UTC  

here, If a sperm cell never enters a female, it will never have a chance to turn into a born baby. If a sperm cell does enter a female, it has a chance

2018-11-02 13:44:10 UTC  

Being human isnt about being born. It's about having exactly 46 chromosomes.

2018-11-02 13:44:31 UTC  

That cell has exactly that many, therefor it is human life.

2018-11-02 13:44:44 UTC  

if a fertilized egg never enters a female, it will never result in a born baby, or 9 months of development

2018-11-02 13:44:47 UTC  

But it wont last because there is nothing to nurture it.

2018-11-02 13:44:59 UTC  

wait, so people with an extra chromosome are not human?

2018-11-02 13:45:22 UTC  

rip everyone with Aneuploidy.

2018-11-02 13:45:32 UTC  

Never heard of a person with 47 chromosomes

2018-11-02 13:45:56 UTC  

seriously? never heard of people with an extra X?

2018-11-02 13:46:09 UTC  

Klinefelter syndrome

2018-11-02 13:47:21 UTC  

Well I wont say I'm not shocked

2018-11-02 13:47:38 UTC  

abnormal, sure

2018-11-02 13:48:29 UTC  

Well fine maybe my exact definition is not as accurate as something else

2018-11-02 13:48:34 UTC  

same reason we can't require having x arms or legs as people sometimes don't. but we still count them as human

2018-11-02 13:48:52 UTC  

But that fertilized egg has it's own unique set of dna

2018-11-02 13:49:11 UTC  

Completely separate from whatever entity's created it

2018-11-02 13:49:19 UTC  

So its life

2018-11-02 13:49:34 UTC  

incorrect. it has half and half.

2018-11-02 13:49:46 UTC  

or in the case of incest, it can be a clone

2018-11-02 13:49:59 UTC  

rare and require mother son or father daughter

2018-11-02 13:50:09 UTC  

but can be

2018-11-02 13:50:31 UTC  

I mean sure.

2018-11-02 13:51:13 UTC  

But that really doesn't change my point though. It's a completely separate thing from the parents.

2018-11-02 13:51:28 UTC  

Be those parents the same person or not