Message from @Paradox

Discord ID: 518035578709737483


2018-11-30 11:48:53 UTC  

depends on what the regulations are regulating. Anything outside the market, is a separate system.

2018-11-30 11:49:03 UTC  

Which again is why I like to use specific examples.

2018-11-30 11:49:26 UTC  

Then what about the one cat said? What about lobbying firms, these are private businesses

2018-11-30 11:49:46 UTC  

What about slavery? That was a private transaction between businesses

2018-11-30 11:50:02 UTC  

limit government power and they go away on their own.

2018-11-30 11:50:03 UTC  

So, Paradox, where do you believe regulation of a market makes sense when the ideal is considered a free market but there is also the desire to maximize the overall social benefit of a market?

2018-11-30 11:50:17 UTC  

Codes, please stop

2018-11-30 11:50:34 UTC  

Ok

2018-11-30 11:50:46 UTC  

Throwing out so many topics you overwhelm the other member and they can't answer without confusing things

2018-11-30 11:51:07 UTC  

Alright, I will stop

2018-11-30 11:51:25 UTC  

So, @Paradox, where do you believe regulation of a market makes sense when the ideal is considered a free market but there is also the desire to maximize the overall social benefit of a market?

2018-11-30 11:53:03 UTC  

1. I don't believe regulation of a market makes sense, ever. 2. Desire? Not interested.

2018-11-30 11:56:01 UTC  

So, in the instance of public safety, how do you address companies lying on labels by placing ingredients different from what they say in a product? Or using unsafe ingredients? Food and drug purity and safety have not always been assumed. In 1906 the feds had to regulate the market to assure products contained what the labels said they did and in 1938 the same had to happen to ensure the products were even basically safe. Both regulations were in response to real market abuses.

2018-11-30 12:00:37 UTC  

@RyeNorth, feel free to let me know your thoughts on this particular instance of regulation as well if you are interested. Or anyone else. Working in health care, regulations in my industry are, the ones I am most familiar with so I'll tend toward those examples for my questions. And trust me, I've got some humdingers for stupid regs. 🙄

2018-11-30 12:06:48 UTC  

Take them to court and sue them. For breach of contract. They said they were selling me this, they instead sold me this.

2018-11-30 12:08:18 UTC  

As for safety, that's also a criminal case.

2018-11-30 12:08:26 UTC  

They get to go to prison.

2018-11-30 12:08:43 UTC  

And in the process people die? Again, that's what happened in the 1930 and before.

2018-11-30 12:08:55 UTC  

Sure.

2018-11-30 12:09:34 UTC  

Okay. You're a purist. That's cool. We're going to agree to disagree.

2018-11-30 12:09:43 UTC  

See Codes, that was easy. 😃

2018-11-30 12:10:34 UTC  

lol...

2018-11-30 12:12:03 UTC  

But you didn't sign a contract, you just showed or in older times didn't show the ingredients

2018-11-30 12:12:17 UTC  

No regulations means, it's not a crime

2018-11-30 12:12:28 UTC  

contract is an agreement, between 2 or more parties.

2018-11-30 12:12:49 UTC  

And the agreement was, I will buy this

2018-11-30 12:12:54 UTC  

If Paradox is willing to permit the deaths of innocents in his adherence to a pure free market, I suspect he won't have issue with some fiscal imbalances. No point in pursuing further. And no, I'm not saying Codes isn't moral, I'm simply saying that his worldview permits immorality which is dealt with after the fact. Mine wishes to address socially harmful immorality proactively. But his is likely more internally consistent because mine will always waffle over shades of grey. I respect his worldview even as I will do everything I can to counter it because my morality differs.

2018-11-30 12:13:52 UTC  

He does until it's his mother, or son

2018-11-30 12:13:52 UTC  

"this" has to be "this" and not "that".

2018-11-30 12:14:16 UTC  

that's the breach.

2018-11-30 12:14:27 UTC  

I will fight to protect him even as he eschews my protecting him. We'll be in conflict, but that doesn't mean that I don't respect him and even envy the simplicity of his worldview.

2018-11-30 12:14:36 UTC  

That was only a thing because of regulation, if they never regulated it. They could continue on with no consequences

2018-11-30 12:14:57 UTC  

no, that's an agreement.

2018-11-30 12:15:21 UTC  

I'm assuming he's fine with his son dying due to bad products and that he'll feel redeemed by the legal proceedings afterward to make him whole in his loss.

2018-11-30 12:15:47 UTC  

That dont do anything because it's not illegal to lie to your consumers

2018-11-30 12:15:52 UTC  

That's the logical conclusion of his argument for a pure free market. He's willing to die for it.

2018-11-30 12:15:56 UTC  

Until ofc regulations