Where is this contract they are supposedly breaching?

helps in court though 😃

sometimes...

Is it implied by regulations?

I am not against harm either, if it's agreed upon.

But it has to be prospectively and specifically agreed upon, right? Like two men about to fight a title match in Las Vegas?

You can't just place "This product may kill you. Don't hold us accountable" in 6 point font on a label and you're good?

No. It could be sold "as is", at your own risk.

Oh my

yeah, you and I will never agree :p

How do you sue if your dead?

Your heirs

They died too

Cause it was your food

If a company is killing its consumers, it won't have consumers...

Then you died being pure for your cause

A martyr to total liberty

Then another company does the same thing

Maybe that one company dies out

great. The ones that are still around are probably the ones I shop from.

Yeah, then they start to sell you false products for profit

Then I die, or sue them.

Cause hey, it's not illegal

and probably buy form somewhere else, too :p

It's not illegal to false advertise, atleast not until it was regulated

Yeah then that new store does it too

Cause again it's not illegal

advertisements aren't an agreement.

Codes, you will never "win' this one. He's got a pure argument. There are no holes until real life happens and he wonders how it ended up this way. Or maybe he really does die a happy martyr for his cause. Or maybe he gets lucky. I'm a woman so we all know we're risk averse. I bow out of this one and suggest you do too, Codes.

What's written on a box is not an agreement

The irony is that after he dies, we regulate to keep more from dieing

It is when that's what they are saying I am buying.

So it wasnt even for his own cause

Then unicorn snot is illegal, even though it's just a kids toy

His whole world is built around Caveat Emptor.

Cause it's not actually unicorn snot

You are not getting what is written on the box

It's a breach of contract, that you never signed, now you can sue them

sure.

or they could put "not actual unicorn snot" on there somewhere.

So you are saying that regulation in that instance is okay, seems like a very strange hole