Here we go. In Indonesia, as of 5 years ago 72 percent of Muslims favored making Sharia law the official law of the nation. 66 percent say religious judges should have the power to decide family law and property disputes. 50 percent say sharia law should apply to non-Muslims. 48 percent favor stoning as the punishment for adultery. 18 percent say that apostates should be killed. 72 percent say there is only a single interpretation of Islam. 94 percent of Muslims in Southeast Asia say that you must believe in God to be a moral person. 32 percent say a woman has a right to a divorce. 55 percent say there is a conflict between religion and science.

And these are the moderates, Cat? Heaven forbid I should meet any Muslim shy of moderate.

That's not very moderate

Yes, that is the Problem. If you really believe in Islam, you are pretty radical in your belief. Like Stoning for Adaultury and ohter shit.
just look at what BRITISH Muslims say about this issue. There's a video about that on Youtube. And they are very radical as well...

@Bookworm Also, source?

```That's not very moderate```
Wich is why China at last put them in Gulags. because all the shit they did before didn't solve the Muslim Problem. And now they go to the extreme.

There is a reason why its always the same people, sometimes from the same Countrys, cause the same kind of trouble. If they are in the US, UK, Germany, hell even Japan and Korea. Always the same shit.

The difference however is that the Japanese and Koreans are proud of their nations and love to be there. Thus they hate these people and, if they are too bad, would throw them out of the Country...

We are cucked and said to be Nazis at birth and have to tolerate those with different oppionion. But you know what: WE SHOULD NOT ACCEPT PEOPLE THAT COME HERE TO TRY TO STEAL FROM US; RAPE OUR WOMEN AND KILL OUR MEN!!
We should also be allowed to hate them.

And of course throw them out of our countrys.

http://www.pewforum.org/2013/04/30/the-worlds-muslims-religion-politics-society-overview/#ftn10

@Bookworm Joa, die Statistik ist schon ziemlich übel und zeigt, wie weit das ganze verbreitet ist. Und das schaut echt nicht gut aus...

Sorry, Stefan, I only speak languages from countries that manage to win at least one World War, but I assume what you said was encouraging, so thank you.

Sorry, My Brain didn't switch to the right mode.

now again in the right language:
@Bookworm Yeah, the statistic looks pretty bad and shows how widely spread it is. And that really does not look too good/primising.

I'm not sure how to weigh in on this...

In regards to Tims latest vid. I recommend this article. It only takes 4 min to read and is full of graphs
https://medium.com/@NoahCarl/who-doesnt-want-to-hear-the-other-side-s-view-9a7cdf3ad702

The left has become the new Facists

*far left

@Deus Vult (JESUUUUUUUUS!) The "Left" has declared anyone not far left is now a NAZI ALT-RIGHT TRANSPHOBIC RACIST SEXIST ISLAMAPHOBIC Monster.

This is still the far left

Just because they are the loudest leftists does not make them any less far to the left

Well they have been actively kicking everyone out of who isn't "Left Enough" so the Far Left has banished everyone else to being Alt-Right

Yes, this does not make them the only people leaning left

They are just the majority

The old "Left" is now the center

No

The center is still the center

Tim has seen simular results where "Left" people are now calling themselves "Right" because they have been kicked out for not being "left" enough

Yeah. One of them is the president.

Add on to it this "Intersectional" dogma that plays right into Hitler's re-branding of Nationalist Socialism (See the story about the Feminist Mien Komf paper getting published) that the new "Left" pushes

Still not "new" they have always been there

They are mainstream now

To those who have told me my caution over Russia and its current leadership is simply my cold warrior soul showing, can you honestly tell me that the two weapons described in this article are not first strike ordnance?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/russia-is-poised-to-add-a-new-hypersonic-nuclear-warhead-to-its-arsenal/2018/12/26/e9b89374-0934-11e9-8942-0ef442e59094_story.html?utm_term=.1bce54865d3a

They are.

Putin just wants the old soviet guarantee of a conventual free hand in limited scale conflicts

If only one side has first-strike ordinance, they are guranteed a win.

If you have the capability to maintain nuclear armament, and do not, you have already conceded.

My only complaint is that we do not have better.

If both sides have the same capability, neither will willingly pull the trigger.

none of these are a "First and Only Strike" weapon, so regardless if anyone uses them EVERYONE LOSES!