Message from @Bookworm
Discord ID: 536409489545494528
Oh the supreme court?
Would you like me to pull up the case where the Supreme court told someone to make signs that the creator didnt want to?
You can tell someone to leave if you don't like the shirt they wear.
Say if it says "Make America Great Again" or "Black Lives Matter".
If you have a posted dress code then yes
K no that's fucked Blackhawk
The dress code has to be based on something like cleanliness.
So only certain *kinds* of physical presentation are regulated.
I dunno, man, I'm not seeing the underlying ideology here.
You aren't seeing the bigger picture. The only reason dress is being brought up is because of external reasons like hygiene.
Style can't be policed
if you post a dress code that says you need a suit and tie
Black tie dinners are like that yeah
and someone shows up in black lives matter t shirt they can fuck off
Well, that's not cleanliness or hygiene.
if you say no hats and someone shows up in a maga hat
then they can fuck off too
That's literally policing style, a position you said was inappropriate at the literal top of the screen at this point.
The event of a black tie dinner is specifically built around the dresscode
You can't have a dresscode that is black tie for a walmart.
Why not?
The event is a sale, and it's built around a dress code?
Black tie supermarkets. There's nothing wrong with that.
doesnt mean the company would do well
Walmart isn't a black tie supermarket. When I say Walmart. I don't mean random company, I mean general store for things people need. A boutique shop that has a black tie thing is separate because that's a completely different thing to a walmart
So you can only have a dress code if you sell certain products.
if you wanted to you could set up a black tie supermarket but i doubt it would do well
People have a right to get services, but they have to follow the rules set by the seller, but only sometimes for some things.
I don't understand the reasoning.
The black tie service isn't a monopoly on a product type. That's the same type of thing as if you just had a store that sold really expensive food.
The whole reason for all of this is to protect people from monopolies that could exclude them from the market that they would need to use if they wanted to live in an area.
Things can be exclusive if they aren't necessary.
the reasoning is more trying to find a balance that doesnt leave either party entirely at the mercy of the other
Wdym balancing? I thought the only choices were being communist and getting raped by the state, or being an Ancap and being raped by corporations?
Personally id prefer a radical centrist utopia where everything is grey and moderate
but not too grey that is
gillet ad vs egard watch ad
What is Tim doing? I've gone from mild disappointment in his uploads and twitter material and after today and yesterday, am now totally mystified at his overt practice of failing to form conclusions with a complete consideration of the matters of fact. All while pissing and moaning about "the media", in all its nebulous definition, will not commit to acting with integrity. Its pitiful.
Explain