Message from @BMSAnonymous
Discord ID: 536435787281989633
That's literally policing style, a position you said was inappropriate at the literal top of the screen at this point.
The event of a black tie dinner is specifically built around the dresscode
You can't have a dresscode that is black tie for a walmart.
What, why not?
Why not?
The event is a sale, and it's built around a dress code?
Black tie supermarkets. There's nothing wrong with that.
doesnt mean the company would do well
Walmart isn't a black tie supermarket. When I say Walmart. I don't mean random company, I mean general store for things people need. A boutique shop that has a black tie thing is separate because that's a completely different thing to a walmart
So you can only have a dress code if you sell certain products.
if you wanted to you could set up a black tie supermarket but i doubt it would do well
People have a right to get services, but they have to follow the rules set by the seller, but only sometimes for some things.
I don't understand the reasoning.
The black tie service isn't a monopoly on a product type. That's the same type of thing as if you just had a store that sold really expensive food.
The whole reason for all of this is to protect people from monopolies that could exclude them from the market that they would need to use if they wanted to live in an area.
Things can be exclusive if they aren't necessary.
the reasoning is more trying to find a balance that doesnt leave either party entirely at the mercy of the other
Wdym balancing? I thought the only choices were being communist and getting raped by the state, or being an Ancap and being raped by corporations?
Personally id prefer a radical centrist utopia where everything is grey and moderate
but not too grey that is
What is Tim doing? I've gone from mild disappointment in his uploads and twitter material and after today and yesterday, am now totally mystified at his overt practice of failing to form conclusions with a complete consideration of the matters of fact. All while pissing and moaning about "the media", in all its nebulous definition, will not commit to acting with integrity. Its pitiful.
Explain
are you expecting him to switch his ideology ?
No of course not, but at the least theres a standard of integrity and authenticity he demands, as most of us do, in folks who have an audience they present to
That he shouldn't be exempt from
Yet we can rely on a twitter rage that looks just like this gem from today
Ugh missing permission to post an im mage
Uploading to imgur
Yes Tim the guy is acknowledging they had awareness of the soap boxers, but the statement is explicitly stating an approach was atleast practicle in spirit of diffusion ,even if those aggressors were over the line
Which they were, the black Panthers of Israel style has every scent of in n principle try and agitate as n opposed to reach out and touch the "uninformed" with scripture
But first this entire obsurd episode with this high school group, Tim has been twitter storming his umbrage of the facts getting lost in the blizzard of coverage and unfair treatment, while he himself jukes and jives around inconvenient matters of fact available in the documentary evidence
Bad faith Tim, low standards
I suspect Tim is being pressured.
If he says what he's actually thinking, he'll be deplatformed and lose access to important contacts.
So he's stuck in a realm of floating around in a state where it's not 100% clear what he's thinking. Of course, the left isn't having it anyways (nothing short of complete lunatic assault on the right is unacceptable) and alot of the right is getting weirded out and confused.
But you can even see his stance on Free speech has been moderated in the recent months. Which struck me as odd.
Unless you realize that stuff like the "alternative influence network" is believed by extremely powerful people who could remove him in a heartbeat.
I can say from what I have seen, it is clear the students were set up for a hit peice and smear jobs. This was a consciense effort from the First Nations Group.