Not just presentation. Anything that is an action that the store wants to prohibit, that anyone can make an effort to meet the requirements. You can tell someone to fuck off if they have no pants.

Oh the supreme court?

Would you like me to pull up the case where the Supreme court told someone to make signs that the creator didnt want to?

You can tell someone to leave if you don't like the shirt they wear.

Say if it says "Make America Great Again" or "Black Lives Matter".

If you have a posted dress code then yes

K no that's fucked Blackhawk

The dress code has to be based on something like cleanliness.

So only certain *kinds* of physical presentation are regulated.

I dunno, man, I'm not seeing the underlying ideology here.

You aren't seeing the bigger picture. The only reason dress is being brought up is because of external reasons like hygiene.

Style can't be policed

if you post a dress code that says you need a suit and tie

Black tie dinners are like that yeah

and someone shows up in black lives matter t shirt they can fuck off

Well, that's not cleanliness or hygiene.

if you say no hats and someone shows up in a maga hat

then they can fuck off too

That's literally policing style, a position you said was inappropriate at the literal top of the screen at this point.

The event of a black tie dinner is specifically built around the dresscode

You can't have a dresscode that is black tie for a walmart.

What, why not?

Why not?

The event is a sale, and it's built around a dress code?

Black tie supermarkets. There's nothing wrong with that.

doesnt mean the company would do well

Walmart isn't a black tie supermarket. When I say Walmart. I don't mean random company, I mean general store for things people need. A boutique shop that has a black tie thing is separate because that's a completely different thing to a walmart

So you can only have a dress code if you sell certain products.

if you wanted to you could set up a black tie supermarket but i doubt it would do well

People have a right to get services, but they have to follow the rules set by the seller, but only sometimes for some things.

I don't understand the reasoning.

The black tie service isn't a monopoly on a product type. That's the same type of thing as if you just had a store that sold really expensive food.

The whole reason for all of this is to protect people from monopolies that could exclude them from the market that they would need to use if they wanted to live in an area.

Things can be exclusive if they aren't necessary.

the reasoning is more trying to find a balance that doesnt leave either party entirely at the mercy of the other

Wdym balancing? I thought the only choices were being communist and getting raped by the state, or being an Ancap and being raped by corporations?

Personally id prefer a radical centrist utopia where everything is grey and moderate

but not too grey that is

gillet ad vs egard watch ad

https://youtu.be/x_HL0wiK4Zc

What is Tim doing? I've gone from mild disappointment in his uploads and twitter material and after today and yesterday, am now totally mystified at his overt practice of failing to form conclusions with a complete consideration of the matters of fact. All while pissing and moaning about "the media", in all its nebulous definition, will not commit to acting with integrity. Its pitiful.