There is no suggestion

The point is to get the government out of a as many things as possible since it is an institution controlled by the enemy

that's a bit too far in black or white thinking for me to endorse blackhawk

the other option is to continue to ignore the larger strategic picture

Indeed, think of Google and the CA laws on Political discrimination.

to view ww2 not as a series of campaigns and logistics, but of battles and tactical decisions

if you do that I promise you, you will lose

No, Blackhawk. There's a tactical picture that matter and if you can't win on the battlefield the grandest of strategies doesn't matter.

The left pushed the political discrimination laws in CA, doesn't mean they aren't potentially useful to us.

And a law to the effect of "Banks will not close accounts on political affiliation" seems like it would do alot for this recent case too.

My larger argument is that the government is aside the point anyway.

Using problem laws against their proponents is a good wait to win support of the opposition to remove them. The trick is identifying a successful method of using them.

Then read rules for radicals and apply it universally

Well, laws or policies.

Much like the guys suing Universities for having women's only things without allowing a men's only version

There is a risk of backfiring

risk is inherent in life

If you want it gone get yourself arrested and put in solitary confinement

Of the opposition accepting the result which you didn't want in the first place. Like leftists accepting the loss of women's only programs rather than pushing back against the "attack against women"

No, don't read Rules for Radicals, read *this*

```RULES FOR RADICALS is honestly not very useful for Righties, despite the fact that it’s the only Lefty organizing book of which a lot of Righties have even heard. In the Tea Party heyday, people basically xeroxed Alinsky’s chapter on tactics: you know: “pick the target, freeze it, personalize it,” all that stuff. But if you read the rest of the book, you quickly see the problem: Alinsky had the benefit of lefty Institutions, many of which he didn’t even have to build, and he blithely assumes that you’ve got access to Institutional support the way he did. Dude ran an organizer training school with a full-time fifteen-month curriculum. Yeah, no, not gonna help us Righties right now```https://status451.com/2017/10/27/radical-book-club-the-centralized-left/

Read what?

The link

all of it

someone who doesnt understand how technology provides a route around the instiutions?

I mean, I'm listening to someone who forgets that technologies are built, run and maintained by people. That if you target people the right way, you can get them *and their technologies* to bend your way,.

Remember when the internet was supposed to be a big, un-censorable and uncontrollable decentralized network that would be unable to be controlled?

Twitter seems to be gaining control. And when you can't do that, you hit the financial services. And the Crypto exchanges (yes, that's already happened).

Bending your way is just a question of minimizing internal resistance

WTF does that even mean?

Get people in the companies and nothing else

Manipulate the ever living shit out of them until they do what you want

Tug at their heart strings, unite them in struggle, force them to contribute to the fight

Who? And what are you basing this on?

I don't get where you're getting this from.

I'm saying we need to band people together. The next time there's a James Damore, heads need to roll.

Or he doesn't get fired.

Only then can you even begin to get neutrality from these institutions.

The next damore is the proud boy who got his chase account shut down

Now whats the solution? Mass withdrawals? Twitter outrage mobs?

This should be the point at which the left loses its collective minds because a black man got his account shut down for political reasons

by what vector should chase be attacked?

And now we come to the end of every time we have this conversation