and each rank and diffrent section has slightly diffrent books to meet them

Sun tzus art of war in there?

There are some wonderful interviews with him

no most of them are actually not about war.

alot of them are historical or having to do with various cultures or concepts about descion making

If i recall correctly his point was that they knew about war they need to expand upon it to understand why things happened and how to use those tools to make better choices

or something to those effects

Sorry to butt in but I’m having an argument in a different Discord with someone who agrees with that article about refugees voting in Scotland. Sad that people actually think it’s a good thing. Might post the entire conversation in a bit if you guys want to see it lol.

Someone actually thinks it is a good move?

Point out then. Why should someone who does not cobtribute anything good to society have a say in how to run things?

How?! It's objectively not.

You need to get a dictionary.

I need a keyboard

I'm telling them that but they say it's "selfish".

open it to the word sovereignty

and beat the fucker in the face with that word

Did that too.

Tellcthem that its sellfish to the ones who have up until tha point been loyal and fubctioning members of society.

That said, a naturalized citzen whom has offically become a citzen

100% yes

Ah, 'selfish', so his argument is based off of emotion.
How surprising.... this is my surprised face...

<:hmkWAT:279732754667667456>

Here: https://pastebin.com/Lc6XgPuP

Conversation thus far.

Am I going to rage if I read it?

When I see biological waste on the ground.

Last thing I want to do is lick it up.

ok.

So no pls.

You will rage yes.

So if you let someone into your home to avoid the storm

You should let them decide which bank to use when you refinance?

Or that you must cater to his meals?

They are fleeing and you are protecting them

Ok now you lose me there

Regarless of what your family has eaten up to that point.

XD a good hosts lets them decide what to eat

thats diffrent

Well good luck arguing, you are talking to smugs with their percieved moral high ground.

You need to prove how that argument is in itself not moral.

It's more like taking someone into your home to protect them from the storm, and then letting them arrange the furniture and the kitchen however they want, without you having any say in the matter.