Message from @Dr.Wol
Discord ID: 406481441891942400
They are trying to be unique by acting the way they do so expecting us to define them as something specific is near impossible. Most we can do is group them by the tendencies most of them have.
Younglings that act like stereotypes
i don't think having a rebellious personality means they have no personality and define themselves by a pre-written identity
unless thats not what you said
except thats how you worded it
i didn't say they have a rebellious personality
i said they define themselves by the current status of "rebel" which in the normie society is a freak with pink-hair and metal all over cuz thats the most common opposite of a normal man/woman in a suit, proper natural hair and a clean face
it's a paradox in that, by acting as such they are defining a "new wave" of beauty where colloquially-defined beauty itself doesnt matter, and then go on to post glamorous pics of themselves thinking they are the new colloquially defined beauty?
which is because they want to belong somewhere, but don't feel like they have enough individuality, so they just join a "brand identity" because then they are part of something
I’m not sure it’s possible to explain using logic.
@Dr.Wol so you are switching from the common notion of "Rebelious Youth" to people that identify as a rebel?
no
i'm saying that in order to have something they can proclaim themselves as, they go with what current society brands rebellious
they don't have a personality thats rebellious
if any of them didnt have some form of cognitive dissonance, there wouldnt be glamor shots of them
it seems to me
you aren't trying to be constructive at all
so ill just leave it at that
i'm not, my original point was to explain as to why those people turn into such weird fashion statements
if you want me to be constructive, i'd say give them a hug and a better purpose in life than to pretend to be something you're not
i mean
it's not about giving them a purpose in life
yeah
so youre saying ping we should nuke Cali
we would be fucked if cali was nuked
a very small one
oh absolutely, the radiation mutation could add years to evolutionary advancement
provided people survive
or maybe detonate underneath them
if you bombed the bay area we would be fucked
tbh, nuking Cali would be stupid
its better to like, nuke some really deserted area near the American border
so the whole world would be like "... is... is this reason enough to retaliate? do we... do we do something? what do we do?"
cuz no one is fool enough to make the first shot that matters
🤔 but fallout
we nuke ourselves
world still goes to war
win-win really
the nukes we've detonated in the US were pretty small
good idea Puke, we nuke ourselves, blame the Chinese and surrender to Sweden
uncontitionally
who tf would even want to take over the US
they'd take our debt
N. Korea prob