Message from @Giant Energy Penis
Discord ID: 441712176294658049
just lumping people together because of race is not racist on its own... biologists do it.. doctors do it... but to imply some sort of superiority makes it racist
I haven't watched it but I watched an analysis of it breaking down how drunk the story is.
I can ignore bad effects. Story with plot holes the size of the moon, ehhhhh.
Doctors do not lump people together because of their race. They group them in โrisk-groupsโ that just so happen to be devided by race.
White people are more likely to develop osteoporosis, etc etc.
Though I've been listening to a lot of voices on the whole "racism" debate.
Including a black dude who says racism is "okay" as long as you aren't being a piece of shit with it.
Racism is ok, as long as you live in a meritocracy
Depends on definitions i guess... i donโt believe that you can really choose if you are racist or not (just like you do not conciously decide if you like cats or dogs) but you can decide how you deal with it if you are.
Racism becomes a non-factor
To a degree.
In terms of.
Change my mind =p
Basically, at the end of the day. Everyone is at least a little bit racist. And that's honestly okay.
That's the message I got from the black guy I watched talking about this stuff.
Without it, you'd end up just being blind / stupid.
I would love to do a change my mind with crowder on gun control... his arguments are so bad ๐
It's the same argument you can apply to everything.
racism has just gotten a lot of bad rep imo,
All them asian wamen who prefer rich white dudes, thats racism too, buy who's gonna call it bad, amirite? ๐
I prefer to say racism doesn't exist, than debate the definition where in the end it means "people are different". Which we already know
I dunno. Crowder's a good guy / is entertaining. The quality of his reporting is.. mixed.
I still remember that one debate he had with the pro-socialist college kid a while back. That went so well I couldn't bring myself to watch the rest of the video.
I did not say that he is not entertaining ๐
I prefer Crowder's reporting to Tim's tbh
He is biased, but you know where he stands
He's biased but it's okay. He's *trying* to be honest at the very least.
Same for Tim?
Everyone's biased, Tim's less so than crowder.
By a fair margin.
Crowder is good if you want pro-right wing, Tim pool just tells the story in context and lets you decide
Really though.
I prefer Tim's stuff just because he tends to get more details than everyone else.
Tim _tries_ to be neutral in a wrong way (if that makes sense to you)
Whether intentionally or unintentionally.
There's always little details and tidbits that end up getting lost with other people that tim reminds us of. Which is always nice to have.
I follow some people that are pro-left. I still prefer that than to _try_ to be neutral
Only problem i have with tim is that he sometimes becomes the story
Nothing against Tim though
..Explain?
when he zooms into the cat, the cat becomes the story, case closed ๐