Message from @TheBritishGamer ❤🔑 (Meh)

Discord ID: 534123018314579979


2019-01-13 21:19:27 UTC  

Compared to the billions of other people?

2019-01-13 21:19:28 UTC  

It seems sort of backwards to die to something you're trying to prevent.

2019-01-13 21:20:04 UTC  

Seems sort of backwards to risk the lives of billions because of a small minority of people

2019-01-13 21:20:43 UTC  

That's the problem

2019-01-13 21:21:16 UTC  

You don't seem to care for people who do take vaccines, and died trying.

2019-01-13 21:22:00 UTC  

You don't seem to care for the billions of people more who do take vaccines and survived.

2019-01-13 21:22:05 UTC  

So what should we do?

2019-01-13 21:22:09 UTC  

Replace vaccines with what?

2019-01-13 21:28:34 UTC  

Natural vaccination

2019-01-13 21:29:03 UTC  

Even pro vaccine organizations support it.

2019-01-13 21:31:02 UTC  

Kid: When I grow up-
Anti Vax Parents: Let me stop you right there

2019-01-13 21:32:08 UTC  

Lol

2019-01-13 21:32:18 UTC  

What's the success rate of natural vaccination?

2019-01-13 21:32:41 UTC  

Actual vaccination (even according to your death rate) has a success rate of 99.9986%

2019-01-13 21:33:06 UTC  

Even according to your numbers of 14 every a million, that's a increadibly amazing success rate

2019-01-13 21:33:12 UTC  

Yeah but it also has a death rate doesn't it?

2019-01-13 21:33:22 UTC  

Surgery has a death rate

2019-01-13 21:33:23 UTC  

Everything has a death rate lol

2019-01-13 21:33:31 UTC  

Ranges from 14-52

2019-01-13 21:33:42 UTC  

This is why I choose not to have surgery

2019-01-13 21:34:11 UTC  

52 people every a million. 99.9948% success rate

2019-01-13 21:34:14 UTC  

Still in the 99.99

2019-01-13 21:34:20 UTC  

Some vaccines are for diseases that don't exist anymore...

2019-01-13 21:36:05 UTC  

But if the success rate is so low, then why do pro vacc organizations support it? 🤔

2019-01-13 21:37:11 UTC  

I'm using your numbers

2019-01-13 21:38:30 UTC  

Why do they support it?

2019-01-13 21:39:01 UTC  

Because they'll come back if you stop vaccinating against them

2019-01-13 21:39:24 UTC  

It's not like the disease magically disappeared when we started vaccinating

2019-01-13 21:39:30 UTC  

Why do pro-vaccs support natural immunizations if the success rate is so low?

2019-01-13 21:39:30 UTC  

We just made ourselves immune to it

2019-01-13 21:39:48 UTC  

Some diseases did disappear

2019-01-13 21:39:48 UTC  

I support regular vacinations

2019-01-13 21:39:51 UTC  

SOME

2019-01-13 21:39:53 UTC  

Not all

2019-01-13 21:39:56 UTC  

Well there are no cases off them

2019-01-13 21:40:06 UTC  

Because we're all immune to them now

2019-01-13 21:40:26 UTC  

Wrong

2019-01-13 21:40:27 UTC  

Dosent mean the actual bacteria and viruses magically disappeared

2019-01-13 21:40:34 UTC  

There is no reason to vaccinate against diseases that no longer occur in the United States. The CDC reported no cases or deaths from diphtheria between 2003 and 2011 in the United States. [13] Fewer than 51 cases and 10 deaths per year from tetanus were reported between 1994 and 2011. [13] Polio has been declared eradicated in the United States since 1979. [105] There have been fewer than 21 deaths yearly from rubella since 1971 and fewer than 25 deaths yearly from mumps since 1968. [13]

2019-01-13 21:41:00 UTC  

"polio has been eradicated"

2019-01-13 21:41:04 UTC  

Coincidence the second numbers of anti-vaccers grow that certain diseases starts growing again?