Message from @Ano

Discord ID: 536548216641159189


2019-01-20 13:59:03 UTC  

You asked where the video went "too globalist", i provided the times

2019-01-20 13:59:18 UTC  

you did indeed

2019-01-20 13:59:42 UTC  

Doesn't mean he's wrong, just means you proved the point that he's a globalist

2019-01-20 14:00:45 UTC  

Anyone who unironically uses the term degeneracy is essentially impossible to take seriously tbh.

2019-01-20 14:00:55 UTC  

Yes, and I want to know how this atomized globalism came about, what mechanisms are at play that push globalism like this.

2019-01-20 14:01:48 UTC  

@Forte58 , sorry for the bias but nice language analysis.

2019-01-20 14:01:54 UTC  

Where people are nothing more than interchangeable economic units that can be plucked from their roots and swapped around the world.

2019-01-20 14:03:26 UTC  

Well

2019-01-20 14:03:50 UTC  

I think they're just flesh and highly complex biological systems

2019-01-20 14:04:00 UTC  

Even I am not special

2019-01-20 14:04:52 UTC  

I am merely responding to you by what I perceive through electrical movements in brain and light.

2019-01-20 14:05:24 UTC  

My muscles type out of pure obedience to my brain

2019-01-20 14:05:36 UTC  

By the way

2019-01-20 14:05:50 UTC  

The human mind has two "selves"

2019-01-20 14:05:57 UTC  

This is scientifically proven

2019-01-20 14:06:06 UTC  

"experiencing" and "narrating"

2019-01-20 14:06:22 UTC  

It's done through a freezing cold water experiment

2019-01-20 14:08:43 UTC  

There is no biological race, it would seem, by the way this way of thinking.
This nationalism, as I put it, is not trying to say you and I are special, necessarily, of any worth by our very genetic composition. It is, however, a recognition of the different blood, races, and your own and seeing that there is more than just some RNA coding there, that there is more than the void of meaning blankness of electrical impulses we receive, at least as we are able to live in our experience.

2019-01-20 14:09:15 UTC  

I am aware of that

2019-01-20 14:09:59 UTC  

By the way i am perfectly comfortable of race as a biological concept

2019-01-20 14:11:03 UTC  

It is, at the natural conclusion of globalism, quite hedonistic and self centered, and therein we can find irreconcilable differences in world view.

2019-01-20 14:11:18 UTC  

With contrast to nationalism

2019-01-20 14:12:09 UTC  

Why is globalism hedonistic

2019-01-20 14:12:13 UTC  

And by the why

2019-01-20 14:12:28 UTC  

Hedonism is just maximizing pleasure

2019-01-20 14:13:26 UTC  

If you like utilitarianism, then hedonism is essentially hedonism on a grand scale.

2019-01-20 14:13:26 UTC  

GG @Revolutionaryarmchair, you just advanced to level 7!

2019-01-20 14:13:42 UTC  

Biological race doesn't exist. Race is a social construct. To argue otherwise is to deny biological anthropology and human genetics.

2019-01-20 14:13:53 UTC  

Forte58

2019-01-20 14:14:04 UTC  

I am really still stuck on the subject

2019-01-20 14:14:50 UTC  

It is materialistic and always centered on your wants without taking in to account the irreparable harms that can come from the ideals of globalism. In that video he dismisses the English blood because what is more immediate to his needs are his materialistic needs, which is understandable, but he inserts this internationalism without thinking for a second of any alternatives to the situation that wont ignore biological realities.

2019-01-20 14:15:18 UTC  

I can perfectly understand your opinion, but learning some more demographics and genetics I am getting exposed to the idea that genetics are real

2019-01-20 14:15:27 UTC  

@Revolutionaryarmchair its not about opinions

2019-01-20 14:15:27 UTC  

GG @Forte58, you just advanced to level 2!

2019-01-20 14:15:29 UTC  

let me post the facts

2019-01-20 14:15:50 UTC  
2019-01-20 14:15:56 UTC  

That would be consolidating

2019-01-20 14:15:58 UTC  

Thanks

2019-01-20 14:16:09 UTC  

If race were more than just a social construct, the genetics of race should show differences strongly associated with the definitions of race. The easiest distinctions come from things like skin color, hair, and eye shape which, yes, are genetically based, but the surface commonality is not enough to justify racial stereotypes. For those stereotypes to be true, the genetics of race have to extend deeper. However, modern genetic data has demonstrated the vast majority of variation (>85%) is found within populations, rather than between them (<15%).

http://www.pnas.org/content/94/9/4516.full
http://www2.webmatic.it/workO/s/113/pr-465-file_it-Current%20Genomics%204.pdf
https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=tlSspaBLkhoC&oi=fnd&pg=PA19&ots=WJHCYRHu5I&sig=9pZlbgPeDdjHwGvE5eOTofn6hTM#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://beck2.med.harvard.edu/week4/lewontin_feldman_sm.pdf
https://www.academia.edu/5017557/Genetic_Basis_of_Human_Biodiversity_An_Update

2019-01-20 14:16:22 UTC  

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/ajpa.20900
"[B]oundaries in global variation are not abrupt and do not fit a strict view of the race concept; the number of races and the cutoffs used to define them are arbitrary. The race concept is at best a crude first-order approximation to the geographically structured phenotypic variation in the human species."
—biological anthropologist John Relethford in 2009

2019-01-20 14:16:28 UTC  

thank you very much