That's uh, quite the economic issue there.

<@&508200811801608192>

@beyond_gravity communist verx spammed a bunch of pictures of a beyblade

>statist socialism
Big yikes

Doesn't work.

@steel inquisitor the sweatshops are capitalist institutions of profit

China is by no means a communist nation

They are an authoritarian oligarchy

Anyone who unironically uses the term degeneracy is essentially impossible to take seriously tbh.

Biological race doesn't exist. Race is a social construct. To argue otherwise is to deny biological anthropology and human genetics.

@Revolutionaryarmchair its not about opinions

let me post the facts

If race were more than just a social construct, the genetics of race should show differences strongly associated with the definitions of race. The easiest distinctions come from things like skin color, hair, and eye shape which, yes, are genetically based, but the surface commonality is not enough to justify racial stereotypes. For those stereotypes to be true, the genetics of race have to extend deeper. However, modern genetic data has demonstrated the vast majority of variation (>85%) is found within populations, rather than between them (<15%).

http://www.pnas.org/content/94/9/4516.full
http://www2.webmatic.it/workO/s/113/pr-465-file_it-Current%20Genomics%204.pdf
https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=tlSspaBLkhoC&oi=fnd&pg=PA19&ots=WJHCYRHu5I&sig=9pZlbgPeDdjHwGvE5eOTofn6hTM#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://beck2.med.harvard.edu/week4/lewontin_feldman_sm.pdf
https://www.academia.edu/5017557/Genetic_Basis_of_Human_Biodiversity_An_Update

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/ajpa.20900
"[B]oundaries in global variation are not abrupt and do not fit a strict view of the race concept; the number of races and the cutoffs used to define them are arbitrary. The race concept is at best a crude first-order approximation to the geographically structured phenotypic variation in the human species."
—biological anthropologist John Relethford in 2009

https://web.ornl.gov/sci/techresources/Human_Genome/elsi/minorities.shtml
"DNA studies do not indicate that separate classifiable subspecies (races) exist within modern humans. While different genes for physical traits such as skin and hair color can be identified between individuals, no consistent patterns of genes across the human genome exist to distinguish one race from another. There also is no genetic basis for divisions of human ethnicity."
—Human Genome Project

https://www.americananthro.org/ConnectWithAAA/Content.aspx?ItemNumber=2583
"With the vast expansion of scientific knowledge in this century, however, it has become clear that human populations are not unambiguous, clearly demarcated, biologically distinct groups. Evidence from the analysis of genetics (e.g., DNA) indicates that most physical variation, about 94%, lies within so-called racial groups. Conventional geographic "racial" groupings differ from one another only in about 6% of their genes. This means that there is greater variation within "racial" groups than between them. In neighboring populations there is much overlapping of genes and their phenotypic (physical) expressions. Throughout history whenever different groups have come into contact, they have interbred. The continued sharing of genetic materials has maintained all of humankind as a single species."
—American Anthropological Association

http://pages.ucsd.edu/~jmoore/courses/anth42web/CartmillRaceConcept1998.pdf
"If human races are geographically delimited populations characterized by regionally distinctive phenotypes that do not occur elsewhere in significant numbers, then races no longer exist and have probably not existed for centuries, if ever."
—Cartmill 1998
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1893020/
Racialism relies upon the idea that large clusters of people who are homogeneous within the cluster and heterogeneous between clusters in terms of genetic similarity exist. However, this idea has no scientific basis and in fact there is evidence against it, as Witherspoon et al. concluded in their 2007 paper "Genetic Similarities Within and Between Human Populations".

and I have a few more I dont want to spam too much

but this is scientific consensus for like 30+ years

consensus on the idea perhaps but I think genetic statistics speak for themselves

also, there are still race realist researchers, that get published. their publications are just riddled with holes and thus justly picked apart by academia

there is so much wrong with nichola wades shit

on the second studty I have a more recent study about race within the biomedical field and its utterly dangerous inaccruacy as to prescriptions and treatments

theres also a significant difference between anctesry and race and their defintiions and specificness in regards to your third study

there is no objective definitionf of intelligence

nor measurement

same for your second study, which focuses evn further by talking about *g* and cognitive ability assessment, which is far from any sort of objectivemeasurement of intelligence

that jbhe website looks extremely outdated

and it talks about SAT scores in the 2000s

that was *years* ago

cognitive ability and the *g* factor are not, however, objective measures of intelligence

and the heritability of these things is still under debate

Its a measure of potential economic success under contemporary conditions. Not of intelligence.

Thats 25 years old

It first posits racial intelligence is real, based on "intelligence tests"

As discussed, these tests are *not* objective measures of intelligence

and it focuses upon this in its points

130 subjects in a 43 year old study

how reliable

Once again: **IQ is not an objective measure of intelligence. At best, its potentially an indicator of a trend of economic success withina contemporary capitalistic society**

Potentially. IQ is not a perfectly accurate indicator of *anything*

Also IQ tests are not globally regulated and their deployment in nations around the world especially of the third world are inaccurate descriptors for those populations

Crime stats arent any indicator of your rscialist beliefs

to suppose that they do support you is wholesale ignorance of the reality of the country and world

Race is indeed a social construct.

More likely, actually. But I guess you're stuck in your 40 year old studies.

YOu post things again and again that aremore and more outdated 🤔

decades behind modern scientific research

its almost like race realism is an outdated pseudoscience

we get it you're a virgin

what about porn without people

i dont see how its selling your body away when youre drawing tits or making two 3d models fuck

I dont believe any institution has the legitimate authority to enforce such a thing

so has sugar

but I dont see you campaigning to ban twinkies. just twinks

the purpose of eating is to survive

but we make extravagant food

no u r

what about porn that doesnt involve people like animations or drawings

fine dining makes eating look like a game, which it is not

theyre both core components of our life and survival that have a natrualistic function but we have used them for other purposes

Eating is not a game

We need to return to scavenged meat and wild tubers

@Children.Deserve.Cancer.REBORN fine dining isnt even how eating is intended on being

eating is for survival

@Children.Deserve.Cancer.REBORN if you're not consuming basic materials to survive, then eating is useless

people want to eat and then cry when they get fat

fine dining is a weapon for subversion

Yes. Abandon spices, abandon extravagances. we must return to scavneged meat and foraged tubers

@beyond_gravity nature did not intend us to cultivate these extravagant and decadent spices, and sugar is scientificallyproven to be addictive yet we use it in all our food

I say down with fine dining

return to the old ways

the way nature intended

eating is not a game

<:gaysper:573265949210312704>

https://i.redd.it/iq4lcbwh6b531.jpg

https://i.redd.it/67rpxuibeb531.jpg

https://i.redd.it/it90b645d7531.png

the best power couple

I hate women, not feminists

theyre mad the white women arent breeding with them

nazis should follow their leader