there is so much wrong with nichola wades shit

on the second studty I have a more recent study about race within the biomedical field and its utterly dangerous inaccruacy as to prescriptions and treatments

theres also a significant difference between anctesry and race and their defintiions and specificness in regards to your third study

https://www.nature.com/articles/mp201185

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289608000305

there is no objective definitionf of intelligence

nor measurement

http://www.jbhe.com/features/49_college_admissions-test.html

same for your second study, which focuses evn further by talking about *g* and cognitive ability assessment, which is far from any sort of objectivemeasurement of intelligence

that jbhe website looks extremely outdated

and it talks about SAT scores in the 2000s

that was *years* ago

Cognitive ability is heritable. Regression towards the mean will highlight racial trends regardless. This is showing that the brain is subject to differences at minimum, therefore no blank slates.

cognitive ability and the *g* factor are not, however, objective measures of intelligence

and the heritability of these things is still under debate

I disagree, how is cognitive ability not an objective measure of intelligence?

On Consensus http://www.udel.edu/educ/gottfredson/reprints/1994egalitarianfiction.pdf

Its a measure of potential economic success under contemporary conditions. Not of intelligence.

Thats 25 years old

http://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/1977-07996-001

It first posits racial intelligence is real, based on "intelligence tests"

As discussed, these tests are *not* objective measures of intelligence

and it focuses upon this in its points

130 subjects in a 43 year old study

how reliable

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886912003741

GG @Ano, you just advanced to level 6!

http://articles.latimes.com/2011/aug/10/news/la-heb-genetic-study-intelligence-20110809

Once again: **IQ is not an objective measure of intelligence. At best, its potentially an indicator of a trend of economic success withina contemporary capitalistic society**

GG @Forte58, you just advanced to level 3!

Those factors necessary to survive in a competitive environment...

Potentially. IQ is not a perfectly accurate indicator of *anything*

Also IQ tests are not globally regulated and their deployment in nations around the world especially of the third world are inaccurate descriptors for those populations

http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/1471-2458-10-508.pdf

http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1481443

http://discovermagazine.com/2009/mar/09-they-dont-make-homo-sapiens-like-they-used-to

should I post some crime stats? I know they are low hanging fruit

Crime stats arent any indicator of your rscialist beliefs

One piece of the puzzle

to suppose that they do support you is wholesale ignorance of the reality of the country and world

I will anyway, shoutout to Jared Taylor https://www.amren.com/the-color-of-crime/

I said from the onset that I will be looking at this as a study of racial metrics