not every place on the planet has equal natural resource value

you depend on me and I depend on you

thus constant wars

so we have a common interest to exchange

no thats false

not every place on the planet has equal natural resource value

again oil isn't the only thing

you can't live only on oil

it was an example

you need other resources that you don't have but i have

some places on the planet would/do have little or nothing to offer

some places has important resources

GG @chuckayy, you just advanced to level 2!

humans with the natural resources will never give them up for some idea of a global commune

and the humans without will always want to take from those who have

this is not correct you talk about importance by the value it has though money

if they are able to do so

communism does not work

resources are always important

I live in Europe you live in saudi

im not talking about money

you can produce big yields like I do

i told you think theoretically a system without money and only goods

then reread what i just said again

and you need it as much as I need your oil for my machines

so all resources are equally important

youre assuming equal value of all communes

first of all you won't establish a commune in a place where you got nothing to offer

its the type of false utopian assumptions communist thought is based upon

it has zero practical value

unfortunately

thats besides the point

there is either unequal value in each location or there isnt

that's wrong, because what you call "communists" are those socialists from eastern Europe that wanted to steal all the goods and oppress the people

nope

im arguing against textbook marxism

I'm not promoting marxism

I'm talking about a new type of communism that is learning from the failures of the past

i mean youre not addressing the points i bring up

not recycling the same ideas that failed

unless each commune has equal value, some group on the planet will inevitably want to take value from another commune