(which is one of the reasons I've taken to his videos, he's challenged me on several things)

i'd say thats a matter of perspective, some people see it as him trying not to be the aggressive "You! you do the wrong thing! you should be ashamed" and instead saying "well, that thing is wrong, but you prolly didn't mean to"

but one might see it as him not wanting to alienate viewers

so he keeps a bigger vieweship etc

I suppose it COULD be argued as him not wanting to divide a viewership

What's your own personal perspective on it?

not me mind you, i'm part of the prior group, that he just doesn't want to be a "side" and instead try to go for a unified line

Today's Episode of Timcast: "The Continual Red pilling of Tim Pool"

Tim Pool is already out of the Matrix, man.

He sees the machine.

😛

Oh I know

cuz i'm in that same basket, i think most of those "soft" SJW's and stuff, protesters and all, anything from those Gun control people, to abortion people, they don't do it cuz they are evil and wanna spread their thing

I think they genuinely just want to do good, and don't properly think through why they're actually standing there

its just funny to see the difference just 3 months ago

I don't think he really WANTS to be defending Trump.

It's just a matter of necessity.

3 months ago: "This is what happened and here are two sides of it" Today: "This is what happened and why one group is straight up lying"

like those people advocating wamens rights,

But none can name a supposed right they are missing, and when asked its always like "yeah, i'm against them taking away "the" rights"

And they can't clarify what they mean

Do you ever watch Donut Operator, Lotheron?

I dont

donut media though, yes

but totally different topic items

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IyzG7AWzb88

Spoiler warning concerning this video, guy claims that something happens. Objective evidence exists showing that this was not the case.

It's much the same as the conversation being had in the media

The 'Animals' comment has cited context

Transcripts, video evidence of it

And evidence of previous times he's said the exact same thing.

i think most of that media already alienated the objective/rational viewers, and are now just pandering to the remaining anti-trump fanatics

cuz it gives them good ratings

Some things, there are two sides

Especially if an objective perspective doesn't exist

and then other times, there's objective evidence.

and other times, theres an agenda

and relevency

and I think, that's the problem

theres always an agenda

relevency

And if the objective evidence disagrees with one person's side of things to a certain degree, it becomes clear that they're lying.

honeslty, not always

but probalby 98% of the time